Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20211 - 20220 of 82996 for simple case search.
Search results 20211 - 20220 of 82996 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the treatment court in 2016 and 2017, following Hatfield’s conviction in an earlier case.1 Hatfield argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631072 - 2023-03-09
in the treatment court in 2016 and 2017, following Hatfield’s conviction in an earlier case.1 Hatfield argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631072 - 2023-03-09
State v. Michael Thompson
identification was impermissibly suggestive; (2) that this court should remand his cases for an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3410 - 2005-03-31
identification was impermissibly suggestive; (2) that this court should remand his cases for an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3410 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
2025XX001330 - 2025-11-25 Court Order (Denied Recusal of Justice Protasiewicz)
CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2025XX001330 2025-11-25 Court Order (Denied Recusal of Justice
/supreme/docs/25xx1330protasiewicz.pdf - 2025-11-25
CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2025XX001330 2025-11-25 Court Order (Denied Recusal of Justice
/supreme/docs/25xx1330protasiewicz.pdf - 2025-11-25
[PDF]
2025XX001438 - 2025-11-25 Court Order (Denied Recusal of Justice Protasiewicz)
SUPREME COURT Case 2025XX001438 2025-11-25 Court Order (Denied Recusal of Justice Pr... Filed 11-25-2025
/supreme/docs/25xx1438protasiewicz.pdf - 2025-11-25
SUPREME COURT Case 2025XX001438 2025-11-25 Court Order (Denied Recusal of Justice Pr... Filed 11-25-2025
/supreme/docs/25xx1438protasiewicz.pdf - 2025-11-25
State v. Michael Thompson
identification was impermissibly suggestive; (2) that this court should remand his cases for an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3411 - 2005-03-31
identification was impermissibly suggestive; (2) that this court should remand his cases for an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3411 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gabriel R.M.
concludes that the district attorney is obligated to refer the case to the juvenile intake office within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10138 - 2005-03-31
concludes that the district attorney is obligated to refer the case to the juvenile intake office within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10138 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Village of Shorewood Hills v. Kenneth R. McGrew
of six as provided for in forfeiture cases in WIS. STAT. § 756.06(2)(c). On June 22, 2000, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3450 - 2017-09-19
of six as provided for in forfeiture cases in WIS. STAT. § 756.06(2)(c). On June 22, 2000, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3450 - 2017-09-19
Village of Shorewood Hills v. Kenneth R. McGrew
, 2000, McGrew requested a jury of twelve persons, instead of six as provided for in forfeiture cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3450 - 2005-03-31
, 2000, McGrew requested a jury of twelve persons, instead of six as provided for in forfeiture cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3450 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Order-SC
. A motion for this court to rehear a case is almost never granted. ¶2 Occasionally, however, the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135175 - 2017-09-21
. A motion for this court to rehear a case is almost never granted. ¶2 Occasionally, however, the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135175 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Monthly Statistical Report - July 2010
the case filings and dispositions of the Wisconsin Supreme Court during the month of July 2010 and to date
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54255 - 2014-09-15
the case filings and dispositions of the Wisconsin Supreme Court during the month of July 2010 and to date
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54255 - 2014-09-15