Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20221 - 20230 of 84008 for case number.

Brown County v. Kathy C.
-98 version. [2] As Kathy notes in her brief, while there are separate case numbers, petitions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2692 - 2005-03-31

Brown County v. Kathy C.
-98 version. [2] As Kathy notes in her brief, while there are separate case numbers, petitions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2693 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Brown County v. Kathy C.
case numbers, petitions and orders for each child, the cases were tried as one. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2693 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Brown County v. Kathy C.
case numbers, petitions and orders for each child, the cases were tried as one. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2691 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Brown County v. Kathy C.
case numbers, petitions and orders for each child, the cases were tried as one. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2692 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Kevin C. O'Keefe
2000 WI 99 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 00-0882-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16370 - 2017-09-21

Robert Ramharter v. Madison Newspapers, Inc
-65, 580 N.W.2d 233 (1998), among other cases, to determine whether public policy considerations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3584 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Joseph D. Minkin
case, No. 98-CM-163: one count of possession of drug paraphernalia and two counts of bailjumping
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6445 - 2017-09-19

State v. Kenneth Heinrich
, and the jury decided the case based upon that theory; thus, it is difficult to know which two of the three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12655 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
to Lori and William Kumbalek and dismissing Bergene’s case. We conclude summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28019 - 2007-02-05