Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20221 - 20230 of 30242 for de.
Search results 20221 - 20230 of 30242 for de.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that we review de novo. Id. Burkes’s claim of ineffective assistance focuses on counsel’s failure
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=818675 - 2024-07-02
that we review de novo. Id. Burkes’s claim of ineffective assistance focuses on counsel’s failure
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=818675 - 2024-07-02
COURT OF APPEALS
, 595 N.W.2d 39 (Ct. App. 1999). Review of certiorari is a question of law which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31843 - 2008-02-19
, 595 N.W.2d 39 (Ct. App. 1999). Review of certiorari is a question of law which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31843 - 2008-02-19
Town of Grand Chute v. U.S. Paper Converters, Inc.
to a particular set of facts present questions of law we review de novo. Eastman v. City of Madison, 117 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14560 - 2005-03-31
to a particular set of facts present questions of law we review de novo. Eastman v. City of Madison, 117 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14560 - 2005-03-31
State v. Larry A. Tiepelman
“a question of law which we review de novo.” State v. Coolidge, 173 Wis. 2d 783, 789, 496 N.W.2d 701 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18978 - 2005-08-30
“a question of law which we review de novo.” State v. Coolidge, 173 Wis. 2d 783, 789, 496 N.W.2d 701 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18978 - 2005-08-30
Jane Hemberger v. Jo Ann Bitzer
this court reviews de novo. See Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis. 2d 973, 978, 542 N.W.2d 148 (1996
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17172 - 2005-03-31
this court reviews de novo. See Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis. 2d 973, 978, 542 N.W.2d 148 (1996
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17172 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203656 - 2017-11-28
erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203656 - 2017-11-28
State v. Thomas M. Raab
which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12479 - 2005-03-31
which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12479 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ronald Beauchamp v. James A. Kemmeter
review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Estate of Thompson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2283 - 2017-09-19
review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Estate of Thompson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2283 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law reviewed de novo; whether the presence of one or more new factors justifies sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=304257 - 2020-11-18
is a question of law reviewed de novo; whether the presence of one or more new factors justifies sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=304257 - 2020-11-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. In reviewing legal issues, such as construction of a divorce judgment, we apply a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348676 - 2021-03-25
. In reviewing legal issues, such as construction of a divorce judgment, we apply a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348676 - 2021-03-25