Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20221 - 20230 of 64955 for or b.
Search results 20221 - 20230 of 64955 for or b.
State v. Michael A. Senecal
remanded with directions. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3413 - 2005-03-31
remanded with directions. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3413 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of the circuit court for Marathon County: GREGORY B. HUBER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HOOVER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66790 - 2014-09-15
a judgment of the circuit court for Marathon County: GREGORY B. HUBER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HOOVER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66790 - 2014-09-15
Village of Hales Corners v. Michael V. Hendricks
809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6483 - 2005-03-31
809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6483 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
mailbox rule applies. In the circuit court, the parties also briefed whether WIS. STAT. § 801.15(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125425 - 2017-09-21
mailbox rule applies. In the circuit court, the parties also briefed whether WIS. STAT. § 801.15(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125425 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
David Schmidt v. Wisconsin O'Connor Corporation
. Sec. 808.03(1)(b). We conclude that this court lacks authority to review an appeal from a court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4385 - 2017-09-19
. Sec. 808.03(1)(b). We conclude that this court lacks authority to review an appeal from a court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4385 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the total. See Wis. Admin Code § DWD 40.04(1)(b) 4 (June 2007). The resulting child support order required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29679 - 2007-07-17
the total. See Wis. Admin Code § DWD 40.04(1)(b) 4 (June 2007). The resulting child support order required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29679 - 2007-07-17
State v. Daniel P. Moen
. It was reasonable for the jury to infer from these facts that he was operating the vehicle. B. Defense Motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4457 - 2005-03-31
. It was reasonable for the jury to infer from these facts that he was operating the vehicle. B. Defense Motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4457 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35179 - 2009-01-13
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35179 - 2009-01-13
COURT OF APPEALS
: (a) The likelihood of the child’s adoption after termination. (b) The age and health of the child, both at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57488 - 2010-12-06
: (a) The likelihood of the child’s adoption after termination. (b) The age and health of the child, both at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57488 - 2010-12-06
COURT OF APPEALS
judicial notice of the administrative provision, see Wis. Stat. § 902.03(1)(b), Perkins does not identify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45328 - 2010-01-04
judicial notice of the administrative provision, see Wis. Stat. § 902.03(1)(b), Perkins does not identify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45328 - 2010-01-04