Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20221 - 20230 of 45815 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the outcome of the trial. Prince appeals. II. ¶10 A familiar two-pronged test governs claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77508 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
, was not ready to proceed on the new trial date because it had not obtained laboratory test results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42082 - 2014-09-15

State v. Gerald Kasian
on a chemical test result showing a prohibited blood alcohol concentration (BAC), Kasian was notified that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10916 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
exculpatory.” Therefore, Hurst fails to meet the first prong of the Trombetta test. ¶19 Hurst contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39278 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Anthony James Daniels
of these tests, the moving party is not entitled to a new trial. Id. In reviewing Daniels's claim, we need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10370 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
rousing him and he learned Thede was dead. A forensic scientist testified that the foil packet tested
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108349 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to the accident. Rabell was unable to perform field sobriety tests because of his injury, but a later blood
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175441 - 2017-09-21

WI App 79 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1300 Complete Title of...
stated that “any placement by Alexis [] is suspended until said Alexis [] has a clean [drug] test result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96471 - 2013-06-25

COURT OF APPEALS
test for controlled substances. Id. The dog alerted, and House was ultimately arrested for possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113088 - 2014-05-27

COURT OF APPEALS
-pronged test governs claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77508 - 2012-02-06