Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20221 - 20230 of 63639 for records/1000.
Search results 20221 - 20230 of 63639 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
misrepresents the record. ¶20 For example, on the first page of his statement of facts, Felton claims all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90808 - 2012-12-17
misrepresents the record. ¶20 For example, on the first page of his statement of facts, Felton claims all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90808 - 2012-12-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of perjury. ¶20 As another example, assume that a party seeks to admit business records under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183374 - 2017-09-21
of perjury. ¶20 As another example, assume that a party seeks to admit business records under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183374 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a handgun at her. ¶7 Certified Facebook records showed communications between Coleman and S.H
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=655604 - 2023-05-16
a handgun at her. ¶7 Certified Facebook records showed communications between Coleman and S.H
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=655604 - 2023-05-16
[PDF]
State v. Andrew B. Collette
was ill. Although the record is not clear, it appears that the purpose of the proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3645 - 2017-09-19
was ill. Although the record is not clear, it appears that the purpose of the proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3645 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for the reconsideration.” Considering everything, the court noted that “the record does not support [Schmitz’s] claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=554060 - 2022-08-10
for the reconsideration.” Considering everything, the court noted that “the record does not support [Schmitz’s] claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=554060 - 2022-08-10
CA Blank Order
of the Record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude that there is no issue of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117632 - 2014-07-16
of the Record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude that there is no issue of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117632 - 2014-07-16
[PDF]
State v. Linda L. McCoy
“[t]old me I need to go get Linda.” The record does not contain any information regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20295 - 2017-09-21
“[t]old me I need to go get Linda.” The record does not contain any information regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20295 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
search the record to determine if it supports the court’s discretionary decision.” Randall v. Randall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52700 - 2010-07-28
search the record to determine if it supports the court’s discretionary decision.” Randall v. Randall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52700 - 2010-07-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not expressly make a finding on the record that there was a factual basis for the charges.3 However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300018 - 2020-10-29
not expressly make a finding on the record that there was a factual basis for the charges.3 However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300018 - 2020-10-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude that no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=499197 - 2022-03-29
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude that no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=499197 - 2022-03-29