Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20231 - 20240 of 50100 for our.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
choice. ¶12 In reviewing discretionary decisions, our task is to determine whether the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79288 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
N.W.2d 577 (1997). ¶7 To begin our review, we shall first examine the contents of the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27473 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
defenses undermines our confidence in the verdict. As we stated in Davila’s first appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35557 - 2009-02-17

State v. Gary L. Kluck
. ... .... We are aware there are counter arguments to the modification of our present rule, i.e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9520 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] John P. Reddin v. Richard Galster
in the instant proceedings. Thus, our policy regarding pro se prisoner litigation does not apply here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11950 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, following a jury trial, of one count of armed robbery and one count of attempted armed robbery. Upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540670 - 2022-07-06

COURT OF APPEALS
with our standard of review. When the circuit court makes a discretionary decision using the proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28818 - 2007-04-30

[PDF] NOTICE
the defendant has been acquitted.”) Based on our review of the postconviction evidentiary hearing, we see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61995 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
his or her thoughts or actions[.] ¶11 In Langlade Cnty. v. D.J.W., our supreme court unequivocally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516016 - 2022-05-03

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 920 (2010). Our review of whether the facts constitute reasonable suspicion, however, is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685122 - 2023-07-28