Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20241 - 20250 of 30242 for de.
Search results 20241 - 20250 of 30242 for de.
Hunzinger Construction Company v. SCS of Wisconsin, Inc.
on a motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment de novo. See Eternalist Found., Inc. v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7362 - 2005-03-31
on a motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment de novo. See Eternalist Found., Inc. v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7362 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to relief.”). Whether a motion was sufficient to require a hearing is a legal issue that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120154 - 2014-09-15
to relief.”). Whether a motion was sufficient to require a hearing is a legal issue that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120154 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as untimely. We review de novo the circuit court’s decision to dismiss Wilson’s petition as untimely. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887698 - 2024-12-10
as untimely. We review de novo the circuit court’s decision to dismiss Wilson’s petition as untimely. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887698 - 2024-12-10
[PDF]
State v. Woodrow K. Bartlett
meets statutory and constitutional standards is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3951 - 2017-09-20
meets statutory and constitutional standards is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3951 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
to the historical facts is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Popke, 2009 WI 37, ¶10, ___ Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37393 - 2009-07-08
to the historical facts is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Popke, 2009 WI 37, ¶10, ___ Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37393 - 2009-07-08
2008 WI APP 79
this question we must apply the statute to the undisputed facts. This is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32496 - 2008-05-27
this question we must apply the statute to the undisputed facts. This is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32496 - 2008-05-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a [circuit] court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo.”’ Id. (citation omitted). ¶12 Whether under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197598 - 2017-10-17
of a [circuit] court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo.”’ Id. (citation omitted). ¶12 Whether under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197598 - 2017-10-17
[PDF]
WI APP 73
(6) to the undisputed facts in this case, our standard of review is de novo. See Hempel v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146970 - 2017-09-21
(6) to the undisputed facts in this case, our standard of review is de novo. See Hempel v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146970 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
imposed on him. Id. at 206. We review this question de novo, independently applying constitutional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372353 - 2021-06-02
imposed on him. Id. at 206. We review this question de novo, independently applying constitutional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372353 - 2021-06-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
process right is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo.” Id. ¶18 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72887 - 2014-09-15
process right is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo.” Id. ¶18 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72887 - 2014-09-15