Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20241 - 20250 of 50070 for our.
Search results 20241 - 20250 of 50070 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by denying his postconviction motion without a hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705569 - 2023-09-21
by denying his postconviction motion without a hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705569 - 2023-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
merit. With regard to the circuit court’s sentencing discretion, our review of the Record confirms
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061667 - 2026-01-14
merit. With regard to the circuit court’s sentencing discretion, our review of the Record confirms
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061667 - 2026-01-14
[PDF]
Charles H. Johnson v. City of Greenfield Board of Review
, 353, 606 N.W.2d 284, 286 (Ct. App. 1999). Our review is limited to whether: (1) the Board kept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18452 - 2017-09-21
, 353, 606 N.W.2d 284, 286 (Ct. App. 1999). Our review is limited to whether: (1) the Board kept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18452 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
discretion when it imposed absolute sobriety as a condition of extended supervision. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806858 - 2024-05-29
discretion when it imposed absolute sobriety as a condition of extended supervision. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806858 - 2024-05-29
[PDF]
Pamela B. Foard v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
as to whether Foard met her burden under § 108.02(12)(b)2 is a question of law. We begin our analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8231 - 2017-09-19
as to whether Foard met her burden under § 108.02(12)(b)2 is a question of law. We begin our analysis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8231 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
outside of its authority. Wis. Stat. § 102.23(1)(a) (2005-06).[2] Therefore, we may not substitute our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35129 - 2009-01-07
outside of its authority. Wis. Stat. § 102.23(1)(a) (2005-06).[2] Therefore, we may not substitute our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35129 - 2009-01-07
COURT OF APPEALS
, conclusive. Id. We may not substitute our judgment for LIRC’s on the weight or credibility of the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98714 - 2013-07-01
, conclusive. Id. We may not substitute our judgment for LIRC’s on the weight or credibility of the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98714 - 2013-07-01
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
assistance of counsel claim.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043040 - 2025-11-26
assistance of counsel claim.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043040 - 2025-11-26
State v. April Dakins
n.1, 306 N.W.2d 292, 294 n.1 (Ct. App. 1981). We therefore confine our review to the issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10890 - 2005-03-31
n.1, 306 N.W.2d 292, 294 n.1 (Ct. App. 1981). We therefore confine our review to the issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10890 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joshua Jenkins
), the Supreme Court addressed a factual situation similar to our case. In Hodari D., a group of youths were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15367 - 2017-09-21
), the Supreme Court addressed a factual situation similar to our case. In Hodari D., a group of youths were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15367 - 2017-09-21