Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20251 - 20260 of 70223 for his.

[PDF] Pamela K. Miskulin v. James R. Miskulin
was ordered to pay child support of thirty-one percent of his gross income from his primary job. In 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10068 - 2017-09-19

State v. Scott M. Doering
his motion to suppress evidence on the grounds that the arresting officer did not have reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6500 - 2005-03-31

State v. Stanley Earl Applebee
to § 941.20(1)(b). Applebee contends that his trial counsel’s failure to advise him of his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11052 - 2014-07-28

COURT OF APPEALS
argues the circuit court erred by denying his suppression motion on the basis that Gottschalk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93912 - 2013-03-11

State v. Gerald J. Van Camp
appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief following a conviction and sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10459 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Hayes Johnson
, the defendant renewed his prosecutorial vindictiveness claim. The trial court again denied the motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17259 - 2017-09-21

Manitowoc County Department of Human Services v. Diane M.
the trial court’s decision to terminate Diane’s parental rights. Frank argues that after his children were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7062 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Manitowoc County Department of Human Services v. Diane M.
. Frank argues that after his children were placed out of the home pursuant to WIS. STAT. ch. 48 child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7063 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Manitowoc County Department of Human Services v. Diane M.
. Frank argues that after his children were placed out of the home pursuant to WIS. STAT. ch. 48 child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7062 - 2017-09-20

State v. Larry A. Tiepelman
of conviction and postconviction order that denied his motion for resentencing. Tiepelman's motion was based
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25474 - 2006-06-08