Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20261 - 20270 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 20261 - 20270 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Kara B. v. Dane County
, the trial court granted summary judgment dismissing the § 1983 claims on grounds that the county defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7849 - 2005-03-31
, the trial court granted summary judgment dismissing the § 1983 claims on grounds that the county defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7849 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kara B. v. Dane County
dismissing the § 1983 claims on grounds that the county defendants were entitled to qualified immunity from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7849 - 2017-09-19
dismissing the § 1983 claims on grounds that the county defendants were entitled to qualified immunity from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7849 - 2017-09-19
Mikaela R. v. Dane County
, the trial court granted summary judgment dismissing the § 1983 claims on grounds that the county defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8237 - 2005-03-31
, the trial court granted summary judgment dismissing the § 1983 claims on grounds that the county defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8237 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mikaela R. v. Dane County
dismissing the § 1983 claims on grounds that the county defendants were entitled to qualified immunity from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8237 - 2017-09-19
dismissing the § 1983 claims on grounds that the county defendants were entitled to qualified immunity from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8237 - 2017-09-19
State v. Donald Harris
he chose not to pursue, his petition for a writ of habeas corpus claims was properly denied. Id. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7537 - 2005-03-31
he chose not to pursue, his petition for a writ of habeas corpus claims was properly denied. Id. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7537 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ claims are procedurally barred under State v. Escalona- Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161797 - 2017-09-21
’ claims are procedurally barred under State v. Escalona- Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161797 - 2017-09-21
Mary Kasar v. Peter Paly
substantiating her medical malpractice claim. We affirm.[1] ¶2 Kasar brought this action against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14853 - 2005-03-31
substantiating her medical malpractice claim. We affirm.[1] ¶2 Kasar brought this action against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14853 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=489028 - 2022-02-24
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=489028 - 2022-02-24
COURT OF APPEALS
to withdraw his guilty plea. We affirm. ¶2 “[A]ny claim that could have been raised on direct appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58296 - 2010-12-27
to withdraw his guilty plea. We affirm. ¶2 “[A]ny claim that could have been raised on direct appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58296 - 2010-12-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
plea. We affirm. No. 2009AP3092 2 ¶2 “[A]ny claim that could have been raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58296 - 2014-09-15
plea. We affirm. No. 2009AP3092 2 ¶2 “[A]ny claim that could have been raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58296 - 2014-09-15