Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20261 - 20270 of 38102 for d's.

COURT OF APPEALS
and “stipulate[d] the finding of probable cause, time limits waived.” Upon finding probable cause, the court set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120188 - 2014-09-03

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 20, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeal...
with the County Executive, who expressed concern over the arrest and “hope[d] that the matter would be cleared up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112661 - 2014-05-19

State v. James L. Kurtz
and Seizure, § 9.2(d) pp. 305-06 (4th ed. 2004). “[C]ourts have rather consistently upheld such police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20149 - 2005-11-09

COURT OF APPEALS
% of the length of the term of confinement in prison imposed under par. (b).” Sec. 973.01(d). We know that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112719 - 2014-05-19

COURT OF APPEALS
therapist said she was “suffering from long-term effects of P[ost] T[raumatic] S[tress] D[isorder].” 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68369 - 2011-07-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the Second Appraisal. ¶19 Finally, James argues this court has the “[i]nherent [d]iscretion” to ensure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=224003 - 2018-10-30

County of Sawyer Zoning Board v. State of Wisconsin-Department of Workforce Development
of Cherry Hill, 799 F. Supp. 450 (D. N.J. 1992) (injunction granted preventing township from applying its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15262 - 2005-03-31

State v. Elmer J. K.
system .… (d) The desirability of trial and disposition of the entire offense in one court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14280 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
represents that, in Agrecol LLC v. Melvin D. Graham-Jackson, Rock County case No. 23-CV-656, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=825013 - 2024-07-11

[PDF] Terry Richards v. Jairo Mendivil, M.D.
verdict, § 805.14(5)(d), STATS., and, in the alternative, moved to change the “Yes” answers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8549 - 2017-09-19