Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20261 - 20270 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 20261 - 20270 of 58483 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the case, the maximum possible sentence if convicted, and the ability to avoid trial testimony that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190170 - 2017-09-21
the case, the maximum possible sentence if convicted, and the ability to avoid trial testimony that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190170 - 2017-09-21
State v. Scott A. Garrigan
. Garrigan argues that (1) the trial court improperly exercised its discretion and violated his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6127 - 2005-03-31
. Garrigan argues that (1) the trial court improperly exercised its discretion and violated his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6127 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to substitution after appeal unless we ordered a new trial or sentencing, which we did not. See Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113196 - 2014-05-28
to substitution after appeal unless we ordered a new trial or sentencing, which we did not. See Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113196 - 2014-05-28
State v. Ricky L. Sweeney
in the trial court. That argument fails for three reasons. First, this court may apply Escalona-Naranjo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13821 - 2005-03-31
in the trial court. That argument fails for three reasons. First, this court may apply Escalona-Naranjo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13821 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Willie E. Willis
a judgment of conviction after a trial to the court, whereby Willis was found guilty of possessing cocaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10279 - 2017-09-20
a judgment of conviction after a trial to the court, whereby Willis was found guilty of possessing cocaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10279 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of him in a lineup to be admitted at trial; (2) the error was not harmless; (3) the lineup
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677332 - 2023-07-11
of him in a lineup to be admitted at trial; (2) the error was not harmless; (3) the lineup
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677332 - 2023-07-11
[PDF]
Susan Bauer v. Village of DeForest
the constitutionality of a prior version of § 11.08(3). The trial court held it constitutional, as did this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4132 - 2017-09-20
the constitutionality of a prior version of § 11.08(3). The trial court held it constitutional, as did this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4132 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to substitution after appeal unless we ordered a new trial or sentencing, which we did not. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113196 - 2017-09-21
to substitution after appeal unless we ordered a new trial or sentencing, which we did not. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113196 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William T. Nell
and cause remanded with directions. MYSE, J. The State appeals the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11786 - 2017-09-20
and cause remanded with directions. MYSE, J. The State appeals the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11786 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Lisa Prince v. Zoning Board of Appeals for Rusk County
. The trial court concluded that the board's decision was unreasonable and oppressive. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9358 - 2017-09-19
. The trial court concluded that the board's decision was unreasonable and oppressive. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9358 - 2017-09-19