Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20271 - 20280 of 29751 for des.
Search results 20271 - 20280 of 29751 for des.
Denise Scheberle v. Bertram Milson, M.D.
The review of a summary judgment motion is a question of law that we consider de novo. Jankee v. Clark
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5633 - 2005-03-31
The review of a summary judgment motion is a question of law that we consider de novo. Jankee v. Clark
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5633 - 2005-03-31
Town of Grand Chute v. U.S. Paper Converters, Inc.
to a particular set of facts present questions of law we review de novo. Eastman v. City of Madison, 117 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14560 - 2005-03-31
to a particular set of facts present questions of law we review de novo. Eastman v. City of Madison, 117 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14560 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31019 - 2007-11-26
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31019 - 2007-11-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as untimely. We review de novo the circuit court’s decision to dismiss Wilson’s petition as untimely. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887698 - 2024-12-10
as untimely. We review de novo the circuit court’s decision to dismiss Wilson’s petition as untimely. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887698 - 2024-12-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(Ct. App. 1995). We review a circuit court order granting a motion to dismiss de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479499 - 2022-02-03
(Ct. App. 1995). We review a circuit court order granting a motion to dismiss de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479499 - 2022-02-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous and review constitutional issues de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43703 - 2014-09-15
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous and review constitutional issues de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43703 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Village of Cross Plains v. Kristin J. Haanstad
of these statutes to undisputed facts. Statutory interpretation is a question of law reviewed de novo. State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21382 - 2017-09-21
of these statutes to undisputed facts. Statutory interpretation is a question of law reviewed de novo. State v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21382 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 138
decision de novo. See Jay M.H. v. Winnebago Cnty. DHHS, 2006 WI App 66, ¶6, 292 Wis. 2d 417, 714 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71185 - 2014-09-15
decision de novo. See Jay M.H. v. Winnebago Cnty. DHHS, 2006 WI App 66, ¶6, 292 Wis. 2d 417, 714 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71185 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Bernard E. Burgess
, we review whether a set of facts constitutes a new factor de novo. State v. Franklin, 148 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3279 - 2017-09-19
, we review whether a set of facts constitutes a new factor de novo. State v. Franklin, 148 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3279 - 2017-09-19
Bank One Wisconsin v. Robert H. Kahl
that we review de novo. State v. Wilke, 152 Wis. 2d 243, 247, 448 N.W.2d 13 (Ct. App. 1989). ¶10 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5090 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. State v. Wilke, 152 Wis. 2d 243, 247, 448 N.W.2d 13 (Ct. App. 1989). ¶10 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5090 - 2005-03-31