Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20281 - 20290 of 29751 for des.
Search results 20281 - 20290 of 29751 for des.
State v. Burley Harding
trial right is a constitutional question, which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Ziegenhagen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14153 - 2005-03-31
trial right is a constitutional question, which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Ziegenhagen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14153 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on certiorari review, our role is not “to weigh the evidence; certiorari is not a de novo review.” Van Ermen
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053789 - 2025-12-23
on certiorari review, our role is not “to weigh the evidence; certiorari is not a de novo review.” Van Ermen
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053789 - 2025-12-23
COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether an exception to immunity applies is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶19. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80829 - 2012-04-09
. Whether an exception to immunity applies is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶19. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80829 - 2012-04-09
[PDF]
WI App 12
. ¶8 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Paskiewicz v. American Fam. Mut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=896202 - 2025-03-20
. ¶8 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Paskiewicz v. American Fam. Mut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=896202 - 2025-03-20
WI App 103 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP646 Complete Title of...
to a set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Xerox Corp. v. DOR, 2009 WI App 113, ¶46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65419 - 2011-07-25
to a set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Xerox Corp. v. DOR, 2009 WI App 113, ¶46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65419 - 2011-07-25
COURT OF APPEALS
which we review de novo. Id. ¶5 Salgado argues that Gregory’s testimony was hearsay and violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52963 - 2010-08-10
which we review de novo. Id. ¶5 Salgado argues that Gregory’s testimony was hearsay and violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52963 - 2010-08-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
factor is a question of law that this court decides de novo. Harbor, 333 Wis. 2d 53, ¶36. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=427045 - 2021-09-16
factor is a question of law that this court decides de novo. Harbor, 333 Wis. 2d 53, ¶36. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=427045 - 2021-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS
to the historical facts is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Popke, 2009 WI 37, ¶10, ___ Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37393 - 2009-07-08
to the historical facts is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Popke, 2009 WI 37, ¶10, ___ Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37393 - 2009-07-08
[PDF]
Maryland Casualty Company v. Evan Ben-Hur
of the trial court's ruling is de novo. Bay View Packing Co. v. Taff, 198 Wis.2d 654, 673, 543 N.W.2d 522
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8272 - 2017-09-19
of the trial court's ruling is de novo. Bay View Packing Co. v. Taff, 198 Wis.2d 654, 673, 543 N.W.2d 522
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8272 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI 19
erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78957 - 2014-09-15
erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78957 - 2014-09-15