Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20281 - 20290 of 68499 for did.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
in detail why he scored the Static-99R as he did, pointing out his specific areas of disagreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107048 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
relief.[3] In this motion, he claimed the police did not have probable cause to arrest him; that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31859 - 2008-02-19

COURT OF APPEALS
and, although he did not himself assess Trinidad’s risk to reoffend, he would have said Trinidad manifested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33708 - 2008-08-12

Betty Jo Ramsey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
summary judgment because the Credit Bureau did not own the property and did not exercise sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14231 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Shawn Virlee
, concluding its retroactive grant of jail credit did not affect Virlee’s actual release from prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4807 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
made “a request … in the briefing for doubling of the security deposit of $750 that they did not get
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142512 - 2015-05-27

Mark Lattimore v. Caldon Rushing
paid rent while incarcerated because girlfriend lived at apartment. Girlfriend did not support me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24572 - 2006-03-22

Radunka Runjo v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company
says: Did Dr. Chrzan perform any of his surgical procedures on Ms. Runjo without obtaining her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8200 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Steven Levsen v. Medical College of Wisconsin
, the medical college argues that Ms. Rinke did not give any expert opinions. Ms. Rinke was called
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15252 - 2017-09-21

Holly Lornson v. Nadeem Siddiqui, M.D.
and companionship found in the wrongful death statute, Wis. Stat. § 895.04(4), did not apply to medical malpractice
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25133 - 2006-05-16