Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20281 - 20290 of 67827 for law.

[PDF] Seann R. Cooper v. Capitol Indemnity Corporation
court concluded that as a matter of law, Capitol Indemnity's policy excluded coverage because Cooper's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9099 - 2017-09-19

Seann R. Cooper v. Capitol Indemnity Corporation
court concluded that as a matter of law, Capitol Indemnity's policy excluded coverage because Cooper's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9099 - 2005-03-31

State v. Johnny J. Waldner
into the defendant's freedom of movement: "Law enforcement officers may only infringe on the individual's interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9033 - 2005-03-31

City of Columbus v. Donald L. Johnson
and made the traffic stop. The officer had not observed the vehicle violate any traffic laws. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7225 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
whether a common law exception to disclosure of records under the public records law applies. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660087 - 2023-05-24

Elvin Crosby v. City of Milwaukee
, and entered findings of fact and conclusions of law in support of that recommendation. Crosby filed written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11723 - 2005-03-31

State v. Parish M. Golden
.’ A strategic decision rationally based on the facts and the law will not support a claim of ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2432 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. James D. Curtis
, 207 Wis.2d 54, 557 N.W.2d 778 (1997), Curtis’s conviction for violating the drug stamp law cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11094 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Tony M. Smith
his genitals publicly, and because Smith’s conduct is not privileged under the law, the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14043 - 2014-09-15

Clarence Pelton v. Division of Hearing and Appeals
to contact his wife, and that the Department acted within the law in revoking Pelton’s probation. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11718 - 2005-03-31