Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20281 - 20290 of 38265 for t's.
Search results 20281 - 20290 of 38265 for t's.
State v. Brian T. Vadnais
, v. BRIAN T. VADNAIS, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8892 - 2005-03-31
, v. BRIAN T. VADNAIS, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8892 - 2005-03-31
Maxim Kleinsmith v. Menard, Inc.
that “[t]he transcript does not indicate that the trial court even considered the possibility that Menard’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2154 - 2014-07-06
that “[t]he transcript does not indicate that the trial court even considered the possibility that Menard’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2154 - 2014-07-06
State v. Peter J. Bartram
: “[T]his fact does not alter the reasonableness of the officers’ decision, which must be evaluated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15864 - 2005-03-31
: “[T]his fact does not alter the reasonableness of the officers’ decision, which must be evaluated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15864 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark H. Brooks
tetrahydrocannabinols (THC) as a repeater contrary to §§ 939.62 and 961.14(4)(t), Stats. Brooks contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15799 - 2005-03-31
tetrahydrocannabinols (THC) as a repeater contrary to §§ 939.62 and 961.14(4)(t), Stats. Brooks contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15799 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kim D. Tesky
at Sec. 161.14(4)(t), Wisconsin Statutes, to-wit: the defendant did unlawfully possess marijuana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11185 - 2005-03-31
at Sec. 161.14(4)(t), Wisconsin Statutes, to-wit: the defendant did unlawfully possess marijuana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11185 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey L. Meyers
). Marijuana, a controlled substance, offends against the law. See § 161.14(4)(t), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8910 - 2005-03-31
). Marijuana, a controlled substance, offends against the law. See § 161.14(4)(t), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8910 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
District IV November 12, 2013 To: Hon. David T. Flanagan III Circuit Court Judge, Br 12 215
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104309 - 2013-11-11
District IV November 12, 2013 To: Hon. David T. Flanagan III Circuit Court Judge, Br 12 215
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104309 - 2013-11-11
COURT OF APPEALS
there was not reasonable suspicion that he was the driver; i.e., the standard is not reasonable doubt. “[T]he requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54733 - 2010-09-20
there was not reasonable suspicion that he was the driver; i.e., the standard is not reasonable doubt. “[T]he requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54733 - 2010-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
(emphasis added). “[T]he ‘statutory maximum’ for Apprendi purposes is the maximum sentence a judge may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38434 - 2009-07-27
(emphasis added). “[T]he ‘statutory maximum’ for Apprendi purposes is the maximum sentence a judge may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38434 - 2009-07-27
10AP2672 State v. Matthew M. Gilbert.doc
with the registration lamp on the license plate burned out, which is an equipment violation.… [T]he officer saw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62149 - 2011-04-05
with the registration lamp on the license plate burned out, which is an equipment violation.… [T]he officer saw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62149 - 2011-04-05