Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20291 - 20300 of 68276 for did.
Search results 20291 - 20300 of 68276 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
contested Marcella’s attempt to foreclose on the couple’s marital home, but David did not. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102087 - 2013-09-18
contested Marcella’s attempt to foreclose on the couple’s marital home, but David did not. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102087 - 2013-09-18
Steven Levsen v. Medical College of Wisconsin
was not identified as such. In response, the medical college argues that Ms. Rinke did not give any expert opinions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15252 - 2005-03-31
was not identified as such. In response, the medical college argues that Ms. Rinke did not give any expert opinions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15252 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brian Swift
shot Owens saying, “just because I did do the mother-fucking shooting, I will do this shit.” From
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6063 - 2005-03-31
shot Owens saying, “just because I did do the mother-fucking shooting, I will do this shit.” From
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6063 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
it did not identify the primary sentencing factors, did not explain the reason for its sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143725 - 2017-09-21
it did not identify the primary sentencing factors, did not explain the reason for its sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143725 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Antoine Murphy
indicated that the sawed-off rifle which Murphy used to shoot Bergman did not have a “hair trigger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2595 - 2017-09-19
indicated that the sawed-off rifle which Murphy used to shoot Bergman did not have a “hair trigger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2595 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
minimum found in § 941.29(4m) did apply. For the reasons set forth below, we agree that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550082 - 2022-08-02
minimum found in § 941.29(4m) did apply. For the reasons set forth below, we agree that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550082 - 2022-08-02
COURT OF APPEALS
is newly discovered to support his other arguments, he did not identify the issue of newly discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69079 - 2011-08-03
is newly discovered to support his other arguments, he did not identify the issue of newly discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69079 - 2011-08-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 100.18 (2015-16), 1 as that statute did not apply to the facts of the case; (4) there was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184859 - 2017-09-21
. § 100.18 (2015-16), 1 as that statute did not apply to the facts of the case; (4) there was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184859 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
made “a request … in the briefing for doubling of the security deposit of $750 that they did not get
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142512 - 2015-05-27
made “a request … in the briefing for doubling of the security deposit of $750 that they did not get
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142512 - 2015-05-27
State v. Eugene F. Olsen
that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in denying the change-of-venue motion, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11112 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in denying the change-of-venue motion, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11112 - 2005-03-31