Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2031 - 2040 of 29810 for des.
Search results 2031 - 2040 of 29810 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Dante R. Voss
, which we review de novo; whether a new factor warrants a sentence modification is committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18387 - 2017-09-21
, which we review de novo; whether a new factor warrants a sentence modification is committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18387 - 2017-09-21
State v. David M. Meza
de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63 (Ct. App. 1991). Even though our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2537 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63 (Ct. App. 1991). Even though our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2537 - 2005-03-31
Joshua K. v. Nancy K.
that in de Montigny v. de Montigny, 70 Wis.2d 131, 233 N.W.2d 463 (1975), the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8437 - 2005-03-31
that in de Montigny v. de Montigny, 70 Wis.2d 131, 233 N.W.2d 463 (1975), the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8437 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
reasonable suspicion is a question of law for our de novo review, contrary to what Fowler sometimes seems
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30997 - 2014-09-15
reasonable suspicion is a question of law for our de novo review, contrary to what Fowler sometimes seems
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30997 - 2014-09-15
State v. Dayon R. Walker
: john a. des jardins, Judge. Reversed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5071 - 2005-03-31
: john a. des jardins, Judge. Reversed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5071 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of a statute to a particular set of facts which is a question of law we review de novo. See, e.g., State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32180 - 2008-03-24
of a statute to a particular set of facts which is a question of law we review de novo. See, e.g., State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32180 - 2008-03-24
COURT OF APPEALS
a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same familiar methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78237 - 2012-02-21
a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same familiar methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78237 - 2012-02-21
COURT OF APPEALS
County: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J.[1] Travanti Schmidt appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121951 - 2014-09-17
County: robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J.[1] Travanti Schmidt appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121951 - 2014-09-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
of law that we review de novo. State v. Quarzenski, 2007 WI App 212, ¶19, 305 Wis. 2d 525, 739 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35337 - 2014-09-15
of law that we review de novo. State v. Quarzenski, 2007 WI App 212, ¶19, 305 Wis. 2d 525, 739 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35337 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). We review de novo whether evidence was sufficient to support a jury verdict. State v. Booker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90168 - 2014-09-15
omitted). We review de novo whether evidence was sufficient to support a jury verdict. State v. Booker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90168 - 2014-09-15