Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2031 - 2040 of 69376 for he.
Search results 2031 - 2040 of 69376 for he.
State v. Domingo S. Hernandez
). Hernandez contends that trial counsel did not properly prepare him for trial. According to Hernandez, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9367 - 2005-03-31
). Hernandez contends that trial counsel did not properly prepare him for trial. According to Hernandez, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9367 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott A. Church
of conviction and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4954 - 2005-03-31
of conviction and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4954 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth J. Hoefer
which led to his conviction for driving while intoxicated.2 He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13535 - 2017-09-21
which led to his conviction for driving while intoxicated.2 He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13535 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeremy M. Wine
that Wine appeals. Wine argues that he should be permitted to withdraw his pleas because: (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14042 - 2005-03-31
that Wine appeals. Wine argues that he should be permitted to withdraw his pleas because: (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14042 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kenneth J. Hoefer
challenges the validity of a traffic stop which led to his conviction for driving while intoxicated.[2] He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13535 - 2005-03-31
challenges the validity of a traffic stop which led to his conviction for driving while intoxicated.[2] He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13535 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jerome P. Wiechert
a person responsible for the welfare of the child. See ยง 948.03(3)(a) & (5), Stats. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11349 - 2005-03-31
a person responsible for the welfare of the child. See ยง 948.03(3)(a) & (5), Stats. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11349 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or No. 2011AP158-CR 2 sixth offense (OWI).1 Mendez contends that he is entitled to a new trial because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74020 - 2014-09-15
or No. 2011AP158-CR 2 sixth offense (OWI).1 Mendez contends that he is entitled to a new trial because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74020 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
driving. He contends that, following his arrest, he was improperly denied his statutory right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31609 - 2006-01-12
driving. He contends that, following his arrest, he was improperly denied his statutory right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31609 - 2006-01-12
State v. Reed Cudnohusky
postconviction relief.[1] He argues that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to obtain the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12355 - 2005-03-31
postconviction relief.[1] He argues that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to obtain the testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12355 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Norman O. Brown
hearing.2 Brown argues that the circuit court erred in concluding that he was no longer serving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14334 - 2014-09-15
hearing.2 Brown argues that the circuit court erred in concluding that he was no longer serving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14334 - 2014-09-15