Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2031 - 2040 of 6433 for wide.
Search results 2031 - 2040 of 6433 for wide.
[PDF]
State v. Ronald F. Zittlow
. This appeal followed. No. 00-2439-CR 3 STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 A trial court has wide discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3002 - 2017-09-19
. This appeal followed. No. 00-2439-CR 3 STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 A trial court has wide discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3002 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
it relied. ¶7 Sprague responds that it is “widely understood that circuit courts have broad discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53699 - 2014-09-15
it relied. ¶7 Sprague responds that it is “widely understood that circuit courts have broad discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53699 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jeffrey H. Bostedt
.2d 830, 839 (Ct. App. 1996). Prosecutors are permitted wide latitude in closing arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14822 - 2005-03-31
.2d 830, 839 (Ct. App. 1996). Prosecutors are permitted wide latitude in closing arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14822 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
amendments to Wis. Stat. Rule 907.02, a wide-open gate for the receipt of expert testimony, State v. Jones
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70315 - 2011-08-29
amendments to Wis. Stat. Rule 907.02, a wide-open gate for the receipt of expert testimony, State v. Jones
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70315 - 2011-08-29
COURT OF APPEALS
a wide range of factors, keeping in mind the competing interests of finality and fairness. Id., ¶36
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91764 - 2013-01-22
a wide range of factors, keeping in mind the competing interests of finality and fairness. Id., ¶36
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91764 - 2013-01-22
State v. Floyd A. Worth
, the identified acts or omissions were outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Guck, 170
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13191 - 2005-03-31
, the identified acts or omissions were outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Guck, 170
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13191 - 2005-03-31
State v. Andre M. Pirtle
conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.” Strickland v. Washington, 466
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9496 - 2005-03-31
conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.” Strickland v. Washington, 466
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9496 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State of Wisconsin ex rel., v. David H. Schwarz
. No. 97-2939 4 acts or omissions of counsel which were “outside the wide range of professionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13111 - 2017-09-21
. No. 97-2939 4 acts or omissions of counsel which were “outside the wide range of professionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13111 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
is deficient only if it falls outside of “the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.” Id. at 689
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33035 - 2014-09-15
is deficient only if it falls outside of “the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.” Id. at 689
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33035 - 2014-09-15
State v. Albert G. Holman
that a trial court has wide discretion in instructing the jury based on the facts and circumstances of each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16318 - 2005-08-30
that a trial court has wide discretion in instructing the jury based on the facts and circumstances of each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16318 - 2005-08-30