Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2031 - 2040 of 7500 for ye.
Search results 2031 - 2040 of 7500 for ye.
State v. Daniel H. Stormer
, , but their BAC level is .08 whereas – THE COURT: It says it on there? MR. PETERSON: Yes. Yes. – whereas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3376 - 2005-03-31
, , but their BAC level is .08 whereas – THE COURT: It says it on there? MR. PETERSON: Yes. Yes. – whereas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3376 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michelle Harley v. Christine Smith Jackson
was signed is not true. This is drafted by Attorney Giese; correct? MR. GIESE: Yes, Your Honor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6068 - 2017-09-19
was signed is not true. This is drafted by Attorney Giese; correct? MR. GIESE: Yes, Your Honor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6068 - 2017-09-19
State v. Alvin Braden
,” meaning two corner cuts of cocaine base. Fox stated “yes,” but as Wilson approached Fox, Fox asked Wilson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4731 - 2005-03-31
,” meaning two corner cuts of cocaine base. Fox stated “yes,” but as Wilson approached Fox, Fox asked Wilson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4731 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Charles W. Randle
as a repeater, [each count carries] three-year penalties versus nine months?” Randle replied, “Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2202 - 2017-09-19
as a repeater, [each count carries] three-year penalties versus nine months?” Randle replied, “Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2202 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Is that all correct? Cousin responded, “Yes,” and the court accepted her guilty plea. ¶19 Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245838 - 2019-09-04
. Is that all correct? Cousin responded, “Yes,” and the court accepted her guilty plea. ¶19 Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245838 - 2019-09-04
[PDF]
State v. Dale Iversen
, and that’s been explained to him, Mr. Thomson, just for the record. MR. THOMSON: Yes, it has, Your Honor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14540 - 2017-09-21
, and that’s been explained to him, Mr. Thomson, just for the record. MR. THOMSON: Yes, it has, Your Honor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14540 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert S. Martinez
to all three questions are “yes,” then the choice has become tainted. ¶7 There is no doubt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3173 - 2005-03-31
to all three questions are “yes,” then the choice has become tainted. ¶7 There is no doubt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3173 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the other members’ answers of “yes/yes/no/no.” The transcript shows the Board proceeding immediately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243056 - 2019-07-03
the other members’ answers of “yes/yes/no/no.” The transcript shows the Board proceeding immediately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243056 - 2019-07-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
communicating with you as far as what was— A. On the telephone at that time, yes. ¶12 Mitra asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45732 - 2014-09-15
communicating with you as far as what was— A. On the telephone at that time, yes. ¶12 Mitra asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45732 - 2014-09-15
State v. Audell Hernandez
? A. Yes. Q. Okay. And that was prior to trial and at trial? A. Well, I discussed his right to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15395 - 2005-03-31
? A. Yes. Q. Okay. And that was prior to trial and at trial? A. Well, I discussed his right to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15395 - 2005-03-31