Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20301 - 20310 of 34005 for dismissal.
Search results 20301 - 20310 of 34005 for dismissal.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the six counts for which Burciaga-Santillan was ultimately convicted, the State agreed to dismiss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138018 - 2017-09-21
to the six counts for which Burciaga-Santillan was ultimately convicted, the State agreed to dismiss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138018 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Esther T.
court should have dismissed the TPR petition because any unfitness was not so egregious to justify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4354 - 2017-09-19
court should have dismissed the TPR petition because any unfitness was not so egregious to justify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4354 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
.2d 599 (Ct. App. 1991). There is no indication of any such defect here. The State agreed to dismiss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95843 - 2013-04-21
.2d 599 (Ct. App. 1991). There is no indication of any such defect here. The State agreed to dismiss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95843 - 2013-04-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and her cross-appeal has been dismissed. However, Matthew has notified this court that he wishes his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108363 - 2017-09-21
, and her cross-appeal has been dismissed. However, Matthew has notified this court that he wishes his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108363 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
to this court but that appeal was dismissed for failure to prosecute. In 2003, Ross filed another motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28884 - 2014-09-15
to this court but that appeal was dismissed for failure to prosecute. In 2003, Ross filed another motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28884 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and the obstructing charge (count two) was dismissed and read in for sentencing purposes. The State recommended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516986 - 2022-05-04
, and the obstructing charge (count two) was dismissed and read in for sentencing purposes. The State recommended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516986 - 2022-05-04
[PDF]
State v. Jheri R. Johnson
dismissed a similar charge and enhancer. The trial court imposed the maximum sentence and denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7799 - 2017-09-19
dismissed a similar charge and enhancer. The trial court imposed the maximum sentence and denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7799 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey C. Miller
earlier bail. In exchange for dismissal of the two bail jumping charges and one battery charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12002 - 2017-09-21
earlier bail. In exchange for dismissal of the two bail jumping charges and one battery charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12002 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
arguments, the court’s rulings on the defense motions for dismissal at the close of the prosecution’s case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242663 - 2019-06-26
arguments, the court’s rulings on the defense motions for dismissal at the close of the prosecution’s case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242663 - 2019-06-26
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. § 806.07(2). In addition, in an order dated May 24, 2010, in case no. 2010AP941-CR, we dismissed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94374 - 2014-09-15
. § 806.07(2). In addition, in an order dated May 24, 2010, in case no. 2010AP941-CR, we dismissed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94374 - 2014-09-15