Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20301 - 20310 of 70147 for his.
Search results 20301 - 20310 of 70147 for his.
COURT OF APPEALS
brought this action against LHM for preventing him from crossing LHM’s driveway to reach his property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67958 - 2011-07-13
brought this action against LHM for preventing him from crossing LHM’s driveway to reach his property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67958 - 2011-07-13
COURT OF APPEALS
from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. The issue is whether Pettigrew’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30159 - 2007-09-04
from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. The issue is whether Pettigrew’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30159 - 2007-09-04
[PDF]
State v. Floyd Worth
on the effect of his failure to testify, as he requested it to do. We see no error, for we agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11046 - 2017-09-19
on the effect of his failure to testify, as he requested it to do. We see no error, for we agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11046 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
with a prohibited alcohol concentration. Nienke claims the trial court erred by denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26788 - 2014-09-15
with a prohibited alcohol concentration. Nienke claims the trial court erred by denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26788 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
intoxicated, fourth offense. Rogstad was advised of his right to respond to the no-merit report and he has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261849 - 2020-05-27
intoxicated, fourth offense. Rogstad was advised of his right to respond to the no-merit report and he has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261849 - 2020-05-27
COURT OF APPEALS
modification based upon a new factor. We reject his arguments and affirm. ¶2 A criminal complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85719 - 2012-08-06
modification based upon a new factor. We reject his arguments and affirm. ¶2 A criminal complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85719 - 2012-08-06
CA Blank Order
Ress appeals his judgments of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147870 - 2015-08-30
Ress appeals his judgments of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147870 - 2015-08-30
State v. Floyd Worth
on the effect of his failure to testify, as he requested it to do. We see no error, for we agree with the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11046 - 2005-03-31
on the effect of his failure to testify, as he requested it to do. We see no error, for we agree with the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11046 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the court erred by denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his pleas without an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43129 - 2009-11-04
the court erred by denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his pleas without an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43129 - 2009-11-04
COURT OF APPEALS
tavern license after his renewal application had been denied, and requesting damages. Heinemeier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28756 - 2007-04-23
tavern license after his renewal application had been denied, and requesting damages. Heinemeier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28756 - 2007-04-23