Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20301 - 20310 of 70147 for his.
Search results 20301 - 20310 of 70147 for his.
State v. Harold S. Fields
the testimony of a police detective; and (2) the trial court should have granted his motion for a continuance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14333 - 2005-05-09
the testimony of a police detective; and (2) the trial court should have granted his motion for a continuance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14333 - 2005-05-09
State v. Floyd Worth
on the effect of his failure to testify, as he requested it to do. We see no error, for we agree with the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11046 - 2005-03-31
on the effect of his failure to testify, as he requested it to do. We see no error, for we agree with the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11046 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the court erred by denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his pleas without an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43129 - 2009-11-04
the court erred by denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his pleas without an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43129 - 2009-11-04
CA Blank Order
Ress appeals his judgments of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147870 - 2015-08-30
Ress appeals his judgments of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147870 - 2015-08-30
[PDF]
State v. Carl P. Fike
., and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Fike contends that he is entitled to a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8980 - 2017-09-19
., and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Fike contends that he is entitled to a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8980 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
modification based upon a new factor. We reject his arguments and affirm. ¶2 A criminal complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85719 - 2012-08-06
modification based upon a new factor. We reject his arguments and affirm. ¶2 A criminal complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85719 - 2012-08-06
CA Blank Order
child had glass in his eye and needed stiches for lacerations on his head. The other child was knocked
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139120 - 2013-12-16
child had glass in his eye and needed stiches for lacerations on his head. The other child was knocked
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139120 - 2013-12-16
State v. James D. Curtis
appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Curtis raises two issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11094 - 2005-03-31
appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Curtis raises two issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11094 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. The issue is whether Pettigrew’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30159 - 2007-09-04
from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. The issue is whether Pettigrew’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30159 - 2007-09-04
COURT OF APPEALS
tavern license after his renewal application had been denied, and requesting damages. Heinemeier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28756 - 2007-04-23
tavern license after his renewal application had been denied, and requesting damages. Heinemeier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28756 - 2007-04-23