Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20301 - 20310 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Search results 20301 - 20310 of 58500 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Mickey Critton v. Jeffrey W. Jensen
this court with a transcript of the trial court’s oral decision. 3 See Duhame v. Duhame, 154 Wis. 2d 258
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17871 - 2017-09-21
this court with a transcript of the trial court’s oral decision. 3 See Duhame v. Duhame, 154 Wis. 2d 258
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17871 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. L.C. Whitehead, Jr.
alleged a prima facie claim for plea withdrawal because the trial court failed to explain during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26264 - 2017-09-21
alleged a prima facie claim for plea withdrawal because the trial court failed to explain during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26264 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
a trial. See State v. Garcia, 192 Wis. 2d 845, 861-62, 532 N.W.2d 111 (1995). In considering whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51519 - 2014-09-15
a trial. See State v. Garcia, 192 Wis. 2d 845, 861-62, 532 N.W.2d 111 (1995). In considering whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51519 - 2014-09-15
State v. L.C. Whitehead, Jr.
for plea withdrawal because the trial court failed to explain during the plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26264 - 2006-08-21
for plea withdrawal because the trial court failed to explain during the plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26264 - 2006-08-21
State v. Tammy M. Jorgensen
consent (OMVWOC). Her defense at trial to the court was that she understood the complainant would drop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2272 - 2005-03-31
consent (OMVWOC). Her defense at trial to the court was that she understood the complainant would drop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2272 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
two issues on appeal. ¶2 Osornio contends that he is entitled to a new trial because the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974633 - 2025-06-26
two issues on appeal. ¶2 Osornio contends that he is entitled to a new trial because the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=974633 - 2025-06-26
[PDF]
at the jury trial; (3) the guardian ad litem (GAL)2 referred to facts not in evidence in her closing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=711420 - 2023-10-05
at the jury trial; (3) the guardian ad litem (GAL)2 referred to facts not in evidence in her closing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=711420 - 2023-10-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. On August 3, 2022, Owen and Alan were placed in Dino’s home for a trial reunification, but in January 2023
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1005561 - 2025-09-03
. On August 3, 2022, Owen and Alan were placed in Dino’s home for a trial reunification, but in January 2023
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1005561 - 2025-09-03
[PDF]
Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Frank M. Kett
). The customers claim: (1) that they prevailed at the trial court level; and (2) that, as prevailing parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12138 - 2017-09-21
). The customers claim: (1) that they prevailed at the trial court level; and (2) that, as prevailing parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12138 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dennis R. Thiel
determine that in a commitment trial pursuant to Wis. Stat. ch. 980, the State must prove beyond
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17478 - 2005-03-31
determine that in a commitment trial pursuant to Wis. Stat. ch. 980, the State must prove beyond
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17478 - 2005-03-31