Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20301 - 20310 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 20301 - 20310 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
a trial. See State v. Garcia, 192 Wis. 2d 845, 861-62, 532 N.W.2d 111 (1995). In considering whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51519 - 2014-09-15
a trial. See State v. Garcia, 192 Wis. 2d 845, 861-62, 532 N.W.2d 111 (1995). In considering whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51519 - 2014-09-15
Edward Vanlennep v. Circuit Court for Crawford County
for failure to reach settlement within forty-eight hours of trial, as provided in § 814.51, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8095 - 2005-03-31
for failure to reach settlement within forty-eight hours of trial, as provided in § 814.51, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8095 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven Richard Evans
CURIAM. Steven Evans appeals a judgment convicting him of possessing THC. He argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16300 - 2005-03-31
CURIAM. Steven Evans appeals a judgment convicting him of possessing THC. He argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16300 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy T. Greene
intentional homicide, armed robbery, and armed burglary. The issue is whether the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6246 - 2017-09-19
intentional homicide, armed robbery, and armed burglary. The issue is whether the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6246 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Edward Vanlennep v. Circuit Court for Crawford County
against them for failure to reach settlement within forty-eight hours of trial, as provided in § 814.51
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8095 - 2017-09-19
against them for failure to reach settlement within forty-eight hours of trial, as provided in § 814.51
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8095 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. John Lee Griffin
. The dispositive issues are whether he waived objections to the trial court's answers to jury questions during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10064 - 2017-09-19
. The dispositive issues are whether he waived objections to the trial court's answers to jury questions during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10064 - 2017-09-19
State v. Tammy M. Jorgensen
consent (OMVWOC). Her defense at trial to the court was that she understood the complainant would drop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2272 - 2005-03-31
consent (OMVWOC). Her defense at trial to the court was that she understood the complainant would drop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2272 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. L.C. Whitehead, Jr.
alleged a prima facie claim for plea withdrawal because the trial court failed to explain during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26264 - 2017-09-21
alleged a prima facie claim for plea withdrawal because the trial court failed to explain during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26264 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Mickey Critton v. Jeffrey W. Jensen
this court with a transcript of the trial court’s oral decision. 3 See Duhame v. Duhame, 154 Wis. 2d 258
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17871 - 2017-09-21
this court with a transcript of the trial court’s oral decision. 3 See Duhame v. Duhame, 154 Wis. 2d 258
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17871 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Willie Quattlebaum
). The customers claim: (1) that they prevailed at the trial court level; and (2) that, as prevailing parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12358 - 2017-09-21
). The customers claim: (1) that they prevailed at the trial court level; and (2) that, as prevailing parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12358 - 2017-09-21