Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20311 - 20320 of 98408 for court records search online.
Search results 20311 - 20320 of 98408 for court records search online.
CA Blank Order
the record for reasons to sustain a trial court’s discretionary decision. See State v. LaCount, 2008 WI 59
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145015 - 2015-07-21
the record for reasons to sustain a trial court’s discretionary decision. See State v. LaCount, 2008 WI 59
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145015 - 2015-07-21
COURT OF APPEALS
may independently review the record to determine whether it provides a basis for the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134640 - 2015-02-10
may independently review the record to determine whether it provides a basis for the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134640 - 2015-02-10
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 23, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140286 - 2015-04-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 23, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140286 - 2015-04-22
COURT OF APPEALS
] by failing to record and annually list nonconforming premises and buildings. The court also concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68270 - 2011-07-25
] by failing to record and annually list nonconforming premises and buildings. The court also concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68270 - 2011-07-25
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion. ¶7 Our review of the record satisfies us that the circuit court properly exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70535 - 2011-09-06
postconviction motion. ¶7 Our review of the record satisfies us that the circuit court properly exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70535 - 2011-09-06
COURT OF APPEALS
to the complaint unsupported by the record. This court dismissed Henderson’s appeal when he failed to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30675 - 2007-10-22
to the complaint unsupported by the record. This court dismissed Henderson’s appeal when he failed to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30675 - 2007-10-22
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 48.90(2). The record is devoid of any facts which would enlighten this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35407 - 2009-02-03
. Stat. § 48.90(2). The record is devoid of any facts which would enlighten this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35407 - 2009-02-03
COURT OF APPEALS
. In essence, the whole history of the record is before this court, everything that the court is aware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57878 - 2010-12-15
. In essence, the whole history of the record is before this court, everything that the court is aware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57878 - 2010-12-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. As Castleberry points out, however, the sentencing record must show the basis for the court’s exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40614 - 2009-09-09
. As Castleberry points out, however, the sentencing record must show the basis for the court’s exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40614 - 2009-09-09
COURT OF APPEALS
Joel. ¶6 The record does not support Bagneski’s argument that the court failed to weigh
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29407 - 2007-06-18
Joel. ¶6 The record does not support Bagneski’s argument that the court failed to weigh
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29407 - 2007-06-18