Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20311 - 20320 of 29827 for des.
Search results 20311 - 20320 of 29827 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that this court decides de novo. Barron Elec. Coop. v. Public Serv. Comm’n, 212 Wis. 2d 752, 760, 569 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165666 - 2017-09-21
that this court decides de novo. Barron Elec. Coop. v. Public Serv. Comm’n, 212 Wis. 2d 752, 760, 569 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165666 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. See Waukesha Cnty. v. J.W.J., 2017 WI 57, ¶15, 375 Wis. 2d 542, 895 N.W.2d 783. ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=440123 - 2021-10-12
de novo. See Waukesha Cnty. v. J.W.J., 2017 WI 57, ¶15, 375 Wis. 2d 542, 895 N.W.2d 783. ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=440123 - 2021-10-12
COURT OF APPEALS
: Linda M. Van de Water, Judge. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part; order reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36888 - 2009-06-23
: Linda M. Van de Water, Judge. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part; order reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36888 - 2009-06-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
findings unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo the question of “[w]hether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307394 - 2020-11-24
findings unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo the question of “[w]hether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307394 - 2020-11-24
[PDF]
State v. Henry T. Skibinski
of a statute is de novo. State v. Irish, 210 Wis. 2d 107, 110, 565 N.W.2d 161 (Ct. App. 1997). A reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2592 - 2017-09-19
of a statute is de novo. State v. Irish, 210 Wis. 2d 107, 110, 565 N.W.2d 161 (Ct. App. 1997). A reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2592 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Ricky A. Myhre
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id., ¶17. ¶9 Our supreme court has recently clarified when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25935 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id., ¶17. ¶9 Our supreme court has recently clarified when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25935 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jason W.T.
is a question of law this court reviews de novo, based on the undisputed facts and the facts as found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5038 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law this court reviews de novo, based on the undisputed facts and the facts as found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5038 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
we review de novo. See Holland v. State, 91 Wis. 2d 134, 138, 280 N.W.2d 288 (1979) (discussing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53818 - 2014-09-15
we review de novo. See Holland v. State, 91 Wis. 2d 134, 138, 280 N.W.2d 288 (1979) (discussing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53818 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. David Beck
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Long, 2002 WI App 114, ¶33, 255 Wis. 2d 729, 647 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5710 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Long, 2002 WI App 114, ¶33, 255 Wis. 2d 729, 647 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5710 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“We review summary judgments de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court.” Hardy v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90106 - 2014-09-15
“We review summary judgments de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court.” Hardy v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90106 - 2014-09-15