Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20321 - 20330 of 30242 for de.
Search results 20321 - 20330 of 30242 for de.
Latisha N. Greene v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
decision to grant summary judgment de novo by applying the same standards employed by the trial court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11389 - 2005-03-31
decision to grant summary judgment de novo by applying the same standards employed by the trial court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11389 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
which we review de novo. Id. ¶5 Salgado argues that Gregory’s testimony was hearsay and violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52963 - 2010-08-10
which we review de novo. Id. ¶5 Salgado argues that Gregory’s testimony was hearsay and violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52963 - 2010-08-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 30, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
posture of this case is akin to that of a motion for summary judgment. Consequently, we apply a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27291 - 2006-11-29
posture of this case is akin to that of a motion for summary judgment. Consequently, we apply a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27291 - 2006-11-29
State v. Joseph Williams
. Whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are issues of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11239 - 2005-03-31
. Whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are issues of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11239 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Nathaniel Wondergem
is a question of “constitutional fact,” which we review de novo. See id. ¶9 The State may not use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13739 - 2014-09-15
is a question of “constitutional fact,” which we review de novo. See id. ¶9 The State may not use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13739 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to the party seeking relief is a question of the law that we review de novo.” State v. Pozo, 2002 WI App 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131640 - 2014-12-15
to the party seeking relief is a question of the law that we review de novo.” State v. Pozo, 2002 WI App 279
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131640 - 2014-12-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of summary judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C. Ziegler & Co., 2013 WI App 127, ¶2, 351 Wis. 2d 123, 839 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133310 - 2015-01-20
of summary judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C. Ziegler & Co., 2013 WI App 127, ¶2, 351 Wis. 2d 123, 839 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133310 - 2015-01-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. See LaCount v. General Cas. Co., 2006 WI 14, ¶20, 288 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66433 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law that we review de novo. See LaCount v. General Cas. Co., 2006 WI 14, ¶20, 288 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66433 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
performed deficiently and prejudiced the defendant are questions of law which we review de novo. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98322 - 2013-06-25
performed deficiently and prejudiced the defendant are questions of law which we review de novo. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98322 - 2013-06-25
COURT OF APPEALS
alleges facts which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103615 - 2013-10-29
alleges facts which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103615 - 2013-10-29