Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20321 - 20330 of 29740 for des.

[PDF] Clark Wolff v. Town of Jamestown
subject to our de novo review. See Armada at 470, 516 N.W.2d at 359. In this case, the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14645 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of persuasion. We review a grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. Mach v. Allison, 2003 WI App 11, ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170434 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Patrick F. Shelton v. Thomas Dolan
of statutory and case law to a given set of facts is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Bahr v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14101 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
de novo.” See Waukesha County v. J.W.J., 2017 WI 57, ¶15, 375 Wis. 2d 542, 895 N.W.2d 783
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=702473 - 2023-09-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the statutory standard is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. ¶11 Civil commitments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=575375 - 2022-10-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
are questions of law reviewed de novo on appeal. Furmanski v. Furmanski, 196 Wis. 2d 210, 214, 538 N.W.2d 566
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97795 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Whirlpool Corporation v. Sharon Ziebert
is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See Lambert v. Wrensch, 135 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16886 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Duane E. Elm
and whether it prejudiced the defendant's defense are questions of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7830 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
standard, but the application of those facts to constitutional principles is subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123009 - 2014-10-02

Denise Scheberle v. Bertram Milson, M.D.
The review of a summary judgment motion is a question of law that we consider de novo. Jankee v. Clark
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5633 - 2005-03-31