Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20321 - 20330 of 63968 for records/1000.
Search results 20321 - 20330 of 63968 for records/1000.
State v. Andrew B. Collette
Cruz, who was ill. Although the record is not clear, it appears that the purpose of the proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3645 - 2005-03-31
Cruz, who was ill. Although the record is not clear, it appears that the purpose of the proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3645 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of the Record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude that there is no issue of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117632 - 2014-07-16
of the Record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude that there is no issue of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117632 - 2014-07-16
2011 WI APP 59
shoreland zoning ordinance must include “[m]apped zoning districts and the recording, on an official copy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63135 - 2012-01-22
shoreland zoning ordinance must include “[m]apped zoning districts and the recording, on an official copy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63135 - 2012-01-22
State v. Larry Lamont Gatewood
acts. Because the record does not clearly reveal whether the DNA evidence presented during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3392 - 2005-03-31
acts. Because the record does not clearly reveal whether the DNA evidence presented during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3392 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for the reconsideration.” Considering everything, the court noted that “the record does not support [Schmitz’s] claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=554060 - 2022-08-10
for the reconsideration.” Considering everything, the court noted that “the record does not support [Schmitz’s] claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=554060 - 2022-08-10
State v. Linda L. McCoy
Dale to get Linda. Dale testified Lewis twice “[t]old me I need to go get Linda.” The record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20295 - 2005-11-16
Dale to get Linda. Dale testified Lewis twice “[t]old me I need to go get Linda.” The record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20295 - 2005-11-16
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
and is supported by substantial evidence in the record, and therefore it must be affirmed. We agree and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4103 - 2017-09-20
and is supported by substantial evidence in the record, and therefore it must be affirmed. We agree and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4103 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence from the DMCPS records that might show Theresa “acting out in a sexualized manner.” Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454289 - 2021-11-23
evidence from the DMCPS records that might show Theresa “acting out in a sexualized manner.” Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454289 - 2021-11-23
Mary Judith Johnson v. Robert R. Johnson
of the amount or value of these expenses, despite Robert’s undisputed testimony in the record. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14610 - 2005-03-31
of the amount or value of these expenses, despite Robert’s undisputed testimony in the record. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14610 - 2005-03-31
Shanee Y. v. Ronnie J.
(1985). We shall not find an erroneous exercise of discretion if the record shows that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6456 - 2005-03-31
(1985). We shall not find an erroneous exercise of discretion if the record shows that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6456 - 2005-03-31