Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20351 - 20360 of 29828 for des.
Search results 20351 - 20360 of 29828 for des.
[PDF]
NOTICE
a question of constitutional fact, which we review de novo. See id. at 66. However, we uphold the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39278 - 2014-09-15
a question of constitutional fact, which we review de novo. See id. at 66. However, we uphold the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39278 - 2014-09-15
State v. Will E. Edwards
muster is a question of law we review de novo. Id. The Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13834 - 2005-03-31
muster is a question of law we review de novo. Id. The Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13834 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶6 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152780 - 2017-09-21
¶6 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152780 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s performance was deficient and, if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149111 - 2017-09-21
counsel’s performance was deficient and, if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149111 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael S. Kazanjian
of constitutional fact that we review de novo. See State v. Bollig, 224 Wis. 2d 621, 628, 593 N.W.2d 67 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15484 - 2017-09-21
of constitutional fact that we review de novo. See State v. Bollig, 224 Wis. 2d 621, 628, 593 N.W.2d 67 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15484 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael S. Kazanjian
of constitutional fact that we review de novo. See State v. Bollig, 224 Wis. 2d 621, 628, 593 N.W.2d 67 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15483 - 2017-09-21
of constitutional fact that we review de novo. See State v. Bollig, 224 Wis. 2d 621, 628, 593 N.W.2d 67 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15483 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Waukesha County v. Dodge County
to undisputed facts, is a question of law which we decide de novo, without deference to the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14669 - 2017-09-21
to undisputed facts, is a question of law which we decide de novo, without deference to the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14669 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. at 697. The issues of deficiency and prejudice present questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134242 - 2017-09-21
. Id. at 697. The issues of deficiency and prejudice present questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134242 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Trammel V. Johnson
review de novo.” Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. If, however, “‘the defendant fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5528 - 2017-09-19
review de novo.” Id., 201 Wis. 2d at 310, 548 N.W.2d at 53. If, however, “‘the defendant fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5528 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Bernard E. Burgess
, we review whether a set of facts constitutes a new factor de novo. State v. Franklin, 148 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3279 - 2017-09-19
, we review whether a set of facts constitutes a new factor de novo. State v. Franklin, 148 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3279 - 2017-09-19