Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20351 - 20360 of 64166 for records.
Search results 20351 - 20360 of 64166 for records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
it failed to explain on the record at sentencing whether he was eligible for the Earned Release Program
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104150 - 2017-09-21
it failed to explain on the record at sentencing whether he was eligible for the Earned Release Program
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104150 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and Taylor’s criminal record and personal characteristics. ¶10 Taylor contends that the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104656 - 2013-11-20
and Taylor’s criminal record and personal characteristics. ¶10 Taylor contends that the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104656 - 2013-11-20
[PDF]
State v. Donald Kaltenbach
a question of fact, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3020 - 2017-09-19
a question of fact, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3020 - 2017-09-19
State v. Leon Taylor
arguments for the reasons set forth below. BACKGROUND The record reveals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7927 - 2005-03-31
arguments for the reasons set forth below. BACKGROUND The record reveals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7927 - 2005-03-31
Lloyd Stunkel v. Price Electric Cooperative
in the record to sustain the jury’s finding that Price Electric was not negligent, we affirm the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14545 - 2005-03-31
in the record to sustain the jury’s finding that Price Electric was not negligent, we affirm the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14545 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Louis M. Elizondo, Jr.
, 1988, which was notarized and recorded on August 13, 1993, and which conveyed the Adams County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12623 - 2017-09-21
, 1988, which was notarized and recorded on August 13, 1993, and which conveyed the Adams County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12623 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Stynes
.2d 753, 756 (Ct. App. 1991) (quoted source omitted). Based on our review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13186 - 2017-09-21
.2d 753, 756 (Ct. App. 1991) (quoted source omitted). Based on our review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13186 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and RULE 809.32, this court concludes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215520 - 2018-07-10
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and RULE 809.32, this court concludes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215520 - 2018-07-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484553 - 2022-02-15
reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484553 - 2022-02-15
COURT OF APPEALS
on the record before us, we cannot determine whether in the communication between the chancellor and the Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62775 - 2011-04-11
on the record before us, we cannot determine whether in the communication between the chancellor and the Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62775 - 2011-04-11