Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20351 - 20360 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 20351 - 20360 of 58285 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Steven C. Deiss v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh
his representation of the Deisses. ¶4 The trial court entered summary judgment in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15447 - 2017-09-21
his representation of the Deisses. ¶4 The trial court entered summary judgment in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15447 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
was convicted after a jury trial of one count of delivery of cocaine as a party to a crime and habitual offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43011 - 2009-11-10
was convicted after a jury trial of one count of delivery of cocaine as a party to a crime and habitual offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43011 - 2009-11-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
court and sought de novo review in the trial court.4 ¶3 Czirr filed a motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51219 - 2014-09-15
court and sought de novo review in the trial court.4 ¶3 Czirr filed a motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51219 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. Nash argues he is entitled to a new trial on grounds he was denied effective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79080 - 2012-03-05
for postconviction relief. Nash argues he is entitled to a new trial on grounds he was denied effective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79080 - 2012-03-05
Cedric Albert Holze v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
PER CURIAM. Cedric Albert Holze appeals, pro se, from the trial court’s order affirming a decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6840 - 2005-03-31
PER CURIAM. Cedric Albert Holze appeals, pro se, from the trial court’s order affirming a decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6840 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
argues the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion and deprived him of his right to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36107 - 2014-09-15
argues the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion and deprived him of his right to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36107 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the circuit court did not err, we affirm. ¶2 Daniel was convicted after a jury trial of one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43011 - 2014-09-15
that the circuit court did not err, we affirm. ¶2 Daniel was convicted after a jury trial of one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43011 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and his motion to withdraw his pleas due to ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529907 - 2022-06-08
and his motion to withdraw his pleas due to ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529907 - 2022-06-08
State v. Ivan C. Mitchell
for postconviction relief. He argues that he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel because counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21487 - 2006-02-21
for postconviction relief. He argues that he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel because counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21487 - 2006-02-21
[PDF]
Cedric Albert Holze v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Cedric Albert Holze appeals, pro se, from the trial court’s order affirming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6840 - 2017-09-20
2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Cedric Albert Holze appeals, pro se, from the trial court’s order affirming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6840 - 2017-09-20