Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20361 - 20370 of 29740 for des.

Ira Lee Anderson-El v. Marianne Cooke
). “On certiorari review, we determine de novo whether the department acted within its jurisdiction, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13736 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158269 - 2017-09-21

2008 WI APP 15
of law that we review de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d at 128, 449 N.W.2d at 848. Finally, we need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31309 - 2008-01-29

Ethel M. Payne v. Acuity
this case on summary judgment. Thus, our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18335 - 2005-05-31

State v. Joseph Williams
. Whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are issues of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11239 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and, if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo.” Ibid. Finally, a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89013 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Glenn F. Plautz By Charlotte Pagel v. Time Insurance Company
of a trial court's grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10001 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Kenneth A. Hudson
findings of historical fact and reviewing the question of reasonable probability de novo, just as is done
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6739 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. at 697. The issues of deficiency and prejudice present questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134242 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 66
motions de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83037 - 2014-09-15