Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20371 - 20380 of 30242 for de.
Search results 20371 - 20380 of 30242 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Charles E. Jones
and seizures was violated, however, is a question of constitutional fact, which we review de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18740 - 2017-09-21
and seizures was violated, however, is a question of constitutional fact, which we review de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18740 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Allen, 2014 WI 106, ¶9, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433. This is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258342 - 2020-04-21
. Allen, 2014 WI 106, ¶9, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433. This is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258342 - 2020-04-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
which we review de novo. Weber v. City of Cedarburg, 129 Wis. 2d 57, 64, 384 N.W.2d 333 (1986). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34227 - 2014-09-15
which we review de novo. Weber v. City of Cedarburg, 129 Wis. 2d 57, 64, 384 N.W.2d 333 (1986). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34227 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Eau Claire County DHS v. Christopher D. L., Sr.
interpretation is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Hutson v. Wisconsin Personnel Comm’n, 2003 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26114 - 2017-09-21
interpretation is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Hutson v. Wisconsin Personnel Comm’n, 2003 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26114 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 234
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶17. ¶13 A ministerial duty is one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26842 - 2014-09-15
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶17. ¶13 A ministerial duty is one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26842 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Duane E. Elm
and whether it prejudiced the defendant's defense are questions of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7830 - 2017-09-19
and whether it prejudiced the defendant's defense are questions of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7830 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law de novo. Id. However, when we review an agency’s interpretation or application of a statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76790 - 2014-09-15
of law de novo. Id. However, when we review an agency’s interpretation or application of a statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76790 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Larry A. Tiepelman
is a “constitutional issue” presenting “a question of law which we review de novo.” State v. Coolidge, 173 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18978 - 2017-09-21
is a “constitutional issue” presenting “a question of law which we review de novo.” State v. Coolidge, 173 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18978 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Monika S. Lackershire
Wis. 2d 246, 257-61, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). We review such constitutional questions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20271 - 2017-09-21
Wis. 2d 246, 257-61, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). We review such constitutional questions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20271 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
requirement of reasonableness is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Guzy, 139 Wis. 2d 663
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56842 - 2010-11-17
requirement of reasonableness is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Guzy, 139 Wis. 2d 663
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56842 - 2010-11-17