Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20371 - 20380 of 64709 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 20371 - 20380 of 64709 for divorce records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 806.07 motion for relief if the record shows that the court exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109207 - 2014-03-17
. § 806.07 motion for relief if the record shows that the court exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109207 - 2014-03-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of these submissions and an independent review of the record, the judgment is summarily affirmed because we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245457 - 2019-08-19
of these submissions and an independent review of the record, the judgment is summarily affirmed because we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245457 - 2019-08-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude that appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619376 - 2023-02-07
record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude that appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619376 - 2023-02-07
COURT OF APPEALS
for adverse possession after 1971; and (3) to open the evidentiary record to show no notice was recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33850 - 2008-08-27
for adverse possession after 1971; and (3) to open the evidentiary record to show no notice was recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33850 - 2008-08-27
CA Blank Order
to it. Upon consideration of the report, Ingrid G.’s response, and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91118 - 2013-01-02
to it. Upon consideration of the report, Ingrid G.’s response, and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91118 - 2013-01-02
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Vandenheuvel
. That is, it is an erroneous exercise of discretion for the circuit court to base its decision on facts not in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26351 - 2017-09-21
. That is, it is an erroneous exercise of discretion for the circuit court to base its decision on facts not in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26351 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Wright neither admitted nor stipulated to a factual basis for the plea. The record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182001 - 2017-09-21
Wright neither admitted nor stipulated to a factual basis for the plea. The record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182001 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, no issue of arguable merit appears. The jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144354 - 2015-07-13
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, no issue of arguable merit appears. The jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144354 - 2015-07-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
for adverse possession after 1971; and (3) to open the evidentiary record to show no notice was recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33850 - 2014-09-15
for adverse possession after 1971; and (3) to open the evidentiary record to show no notice was recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33850 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, on attaining 17 years of age, petition the court to expunge the court’s record of the juvenile’s adjudication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60478 - 2011-02-28
, on attaining 17 years of age, petition the court to expunge the court’s record of the juvenile’s adjudication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60478 - 2011-02-28