Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20381 - 20390 of 28855 for W.
Search results 20381 - 20390 of 28855 for W.
State v. Darryl H. Stegall
for Milwaukee County: Jean w. dimotto, Judge. Affirmed. Before Fine, Schudson and Curley, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6065 - 2005-03-31
for Milwaukee County: Jean w. dimotto, Judge. Affirmed. Before Fine, Schudson and Curley, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6065 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a conviction and order a new trial in the interest of justice pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.35. However, “[w
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644956 - 2023-04-18
a conviction and order a new trial in the interest of justice pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.35. However, “[w
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644956 - 2023-04-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. for Brown Cnty., 2021AP1269-W (WI App. Dec. 22, 2021). No. 2022AP263 6 ¶7 Hammersley now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747814 - 2024-01-04
. for Brown Cnty., 2021AP1269-W (WI App. Dec. 22, 2021). No. 2022AP263 6 ¶7 Hammersley now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747814 - 2024-01-04
[PDF]
State v. Chris Lamar Crittendon
No. 04-0094 6 no discretion and must hold an evidentiary hearing.” Id. As such, “[w]hether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7228 - 2017-09-20
No. 04-0094 6 no discretion and must hold an evidentiary hearing.” Id. As such, “[w]hether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7228 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Cleveland Brown, Jr.
to sentence, the defendant spoke at length to the court, indicating that he knew what he [w
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10524 - 2017-09-20
to sentence, the defendant spoke at length to the court, indicating that he knew what he [w
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10524 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI 108
involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation." 6 SCR 20:1.5(b) states that "[w]hen the lawyer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29810 - 2014-09-15
involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation." 6 SCR 20:1.5(b) states that "[w]hen the lawyer
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29810 - 2014-09-15
08AP2906 City of Mequon v. Gleen H. Sievers.doc
51, 60, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996) teaches: [W]hen a police officer observes lawful but suspicious conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36350 - 2009-05-05
51, 60, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996) teaches: [W]hen a police officer observes lawful but suspicious conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36350 - 2009-05-05
State v. Eric Garcia
. 1989) (“[W]here the facts relevant to the standing issue are not in dispute, we may examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7313 - 2005-03-31
. 1989) (“[W]here the facts relevant to the standing issue are not in dispute, we may examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7313 - 2005-03-31
Johnny Larry v. David H. Schwarz
, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David W. Schwarz, Administrator, Division of Hearings and Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10253 - 2005-03-31
, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David W. Schwarz, Administrator, Division of Hearings and Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10253 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Admin. Code § DOC 303.78(2) provides that “[w]hen the warden assigns an advocate, the advocate’s purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80374 - 2012-04-04
Admin. Code § DOC 303.78(2) provides that “[w]hen the warden assigns an advocate, the advocate’s purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80374 - 2012-04-04