Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20381 - 20390 of 83965 for case search.
Search results 20381 - 20390 of 83965 for case search.
[PDF]
State v. Casey J. Schneck
2002 WI App 239 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0513-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4979 - 2017-09-19
2002 WI App 239 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0513-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4979 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837468 - 2024-08-13
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837468 - 2024-08-13
State v. Tina M. Satzke
comment on the position of the State that we should treat this case under the rubric of due process rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24705 - 2006-04-04
comment on the position of the State that we should treat this case under the rubric of due process rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24705 - 2006-04-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the criminal case was the same “matter in controversy” as the TPR under SCR 60.04 and because reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124790 - 2017-09-21
the criminal case was the same “matter in controversy” as the TPR under SCR 60.04 and because reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124790 - 2017-09-21
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Eric A.
] order. See Wis. Stat. § 48.415(2). The case was tried to a jury over five days. The jury concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18684 - 2005-03-31
] order. See Wis. Stat. § 48.415(2). The case was tried to a jury over five days. The jury concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18684 - 2005-03-31
State v. Todd D. Moskonas
that the treatment order is void. The State relies on § 973.13, Stats., which provides: In any case where the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10461 - 2005-03-31
that the treatment order is void. The State relies on § 973.13, Stats., which provides: In any case where the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10461 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - March 2021
1 WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES MARCH 2021 NOTICE: Due
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=343380 - 2021-03-03
1 WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES MARCH 2021 NOTICE: Due
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=343380 - 2021-03-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
new cases against McKercher. In Douglas County case No. 2017CM158, the State charged McKercher
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=548476 - 2022-07-26
new cases against McKercher. In Douglas County case No. 2017CM158, the State charged McKercher
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=548476 - 2022-07-26
[PDF]
State v. Franciollo L. Jones
2004 WI App 212 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-3245-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7106 - 2017-09-20
2004 WI App 212 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-3245-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7106 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
[es] in this case and that their nature as probation agents would infer some prior criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160148 - 2017-09-21
[es] in this case and that their nature as probation agents would infer some prior criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160148 - 2017-09-21