Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2041 - 2050 of 17414 for Cost.
Search results 2041 - 2050 of 17414 for Cost.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
; and (3) the “cost approach,” which focuses on the cost of replacement.3 Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75830 - 2014-09-15
; and (3) the “cost approach,” which focuses on the cost of replacement.3 Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75830 - 2014-09-15
Meriter Hospital, Inc. v. Dane County
day.[4] The total cost for Gibson’s care and treatment at Meriter, not including the overtime pay
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16681 - 2005-03-31
day.[4] The total cost for Gibson’s care and treatment at Meriter, not including the overtime pay
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16681 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Meriter Hospital, Inc. v. Dane County
. . . . (2) The prisoner is liable for the costs of medical and hospital care outside of the jail or house
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16681 - 2017-09-21
. . . . (2) The prisoner is liable for the costs of medical and hospital care outside of the jail or house
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16681 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dale M. Buegel v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
of procedure by the Board”; and the trial court improperly affirmed the issue of costs and the propriety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6484 - 2017-09-19
of procedure by the Board”; and the trial court improperly affirmed the issue of costs and the propriety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6484 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
; and (3) the “cost approach,” which focuses on the cost of replacement.[3] Id. ¶17 At issue here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75830 - 2011-12-28
; and (3) the “cost approach,” which focuses on the cost of replacement.[3] Id. ¶17 At issue here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75830 - 2011-12-28
Frontsheet
Washington should be required to pay the full costs of this reinstatement proceeding, which were $4,634.04
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33127 - 2008-06-19
Washington should be required to pay the full costs of this reinstatement proceeding, which were $4,634.04
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33127 - 2008-06-19
[PDF]
WI 66
be required to pay the full costs of this reinstatement proceeding, which were $4,634.04 as of January 10
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33127 - 2014-09-15
be required to pay the full costs of this reinstatement proceeding, which were $4,634.04 as of January 10
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33127 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
3 $36,200, and that the estimated cost of repairing the building would exceed $150,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808040 - 2024-05-31
3 $36,200, and that the estimated cost of repairing the building would exceed $150,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808040 - 2024-05-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
costs under § 19.37(2)(a) because, it argues, it prevailed "in whole or in substantial part
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143337 - 2017-09-21
costs under § 19.37(2)(a) because, it argues, it prevailed "in whole or in substantial part
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143337 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
, seeks to recover reasonable attorney fees, damages, and other actual costs under § 19.37(2)(a) because
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143337 - 2015-06-17
, seeks to recover reasonable attorney fees, damages, and other actual costs under § 19.37(2)(a) because
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143337 - 2015-06-17