Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2041 - 2050 of 30191 for de.
Search results 2041 - 2050 of 30191 for de.
County of Waukesha v. Laura J. M.
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19177 - 2005-08-02
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19177 - 2005-08-02
Joshua K. v. Nancy K.
that in de Montigny v. de Montigny, 70 Wis.2d 131, 233 N.W.2d 463 (1975), the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8437 - 2005-03-31
that in de Montigny v. de Montigny, 70 Wis.2d 131, 233 N.W.2d 463 (1975), the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8437 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Avery T., Jr.
or defense materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8592 - 2017-09-19
or defense materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8592 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). We review de novo whether evidence was sufficient to support a jury verdict. State v. Booker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90168 - 2014-09-15
omitted). We review de novo whether evidence was sufficient to support a jury verdict. State v. Booker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90168 - 2014-09-15
State v. Paul E. Hnanicek
of which are subject to our de novo review. See State v. Waldner, 206 Wis.2d 51, 54, 556 N.W.2d 681, 683
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13762 - 2005-03-31
of which are subject to our de novo review. See State v. Waldner, 206 Wis.2d 51, 54, 556 N.W.2d 681, 683
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13762 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Gordon A. Gerke v. Jason R. Coyier
to interpret its plan; therefore, we review the terms of the plan de novo. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11674 - 2017-09-19
to interpret its plan; therefore, we review the terms of the plan de novo. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11674 - 2017-09-19
State v. David M. Meza
de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63 (Ct. App. 1991). Even though our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2537 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63 (Ct. App. 1991). Even though our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2537 - 2005-03-31
State v. Craig A. Sommer
presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8156 - 2005-03-31
presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8156 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Department of Workforce Development
when it applied a de novo standard of review and that DWD’s decision is unreasonable, as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13492 - 2017-09-21
when it applied a de novo standard of review and that DWD’s decision is unreasonable, as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13492 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Stacie Neldaughter v. State of Wisconsin Board of Nursing
on a matter of public concern, protected under the First Amendment. ¶8 We review an agency’s decision de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2938 - 2017-09-19
on a matter of public concern, protected under the First Amendment. ¶8 We review an agency’s decision de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2938 - 2017-09-19