Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2041 - 2050 of 30059 for de.
Search results 2041 - 2050 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
State v. David A. Morris
an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2329 - 2017-09-19
an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2329 - 2017-09-19
City of Oshkosh v. Rose M. Forbes
expert testimony is required is a question of law to be reviewed de novo, no case law backs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8827 - 2005-03-31
expert testimony is required is a question of law to be reviewed de novo, no case law backs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8827 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the law to those facts de novo.” Id. (citations omitted). ¶7 A police officer’s warrantless entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67144 - 2014-09-15
the law to those facts de novo.” Id. (citations omitted). ¶7 A police officer’s warrantless entry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67144 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo. Id., ¶9. “[I]f the motion does not raise facts sufficient to entitle the movant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294348 - 2020-10-07
review de novo. Id., ¶9. “[I]f the motion does not raise facts sufficient to entitle the movant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294348 - 2020-10-07
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kimberly A. Theobald
erroneous but conclusions of law are reviewed on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16794 - 2005-03-31
erroneous but conclusions of law are reviewed on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16794 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Avery T., Jr.
or defense materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8594 - 2017-09-19
or defense materially violated the spirit of the plea agreement is reviewed under a de novo standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8594 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135469 - 2017-09-21
motion. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135469 - 2017-09-21
Josephine Eckendorf v. Richard Austin
is a question of law and will be reviewed de novo. See Atkinson, 211 Wis. 2d at 638. ¶8 The Austins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2391 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law and will be reviewed de novo. See Atkinson, 211 Wis. 2d at 638. ¶8 The Austins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2391 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
is a question of law we review de novo. See, e.g., State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32180 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law we review de novo. See, e.g., State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32180 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
County of Fond du Lac v. Vincent W. English
findings of fact unless clearly erroneous and review de novo whether such facts satisfy constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18696 - 2017-09-21
findings of fact unless clearly erroneous and review de novo whether such facts satisfy constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18696 - 2017-09-21