Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2041 - 2050 of 82619 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.

[PDF]
terminated, “[r]elationships with biological parents often survive TPR orders, in part because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=711420 - 2023-10-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to enter an order suppressing the blood test results. The court granted Thatcher’s motion, over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619585 - 2023-02-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to Lettau’s breath test result set forth in WIS. STAT. § 885.235. It further asserts that had the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250918 - 2019-12-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEALS from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159444 - 2017-09-21

State v. Treble Hworb Henderson
a complaint that he had broken into a woman’s apartment and forcibly raped her. The trial court ordered tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3031 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Treble Hworb Henderson
. The trial court ordered tests of Henderson’s blood, saliva, and head and pubic hairs to be taken so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3031 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Village of Westfield v. Thomas A. Moore
also presents his trial motion to exclude evidence of the result of the Intoxilyzer test of his breath
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9941 - 2017-09-19

Village of Westfield v. Thomas A. Moore
test of his breath. We affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND On May 28, 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9941 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State of the Judiciary Address 2005
of the key trends that the courts must address in order to maintain the trust and confidence of the people
/publications/speeches/docs/judaddress05.pdf - 2009-11-19

State v. Robert Curtis
Curtis waived the opportunity to have DNA testing done on the semen sample, and whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8145 - 2005-03-31