Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2041 - 2050 of 7604 for ow.

[PDF] Allen R. Radtke, Jr. v. East Mequon Business Park Limited Partnership
that the Partnership owed him a fiduciary obligation arising out of the promise to form a partnership. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10395 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
. Because $351,693.78 remained owing on the loan after the sheriff’s sale of the Patti Lane property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74750 - 2011-12-06

[PDF] Ricky D. Stephenson v. Universal Metrics, Inc
as the trial court when reviewing summary judgment, we owe no deference to the conclusion of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2629 - 2017-09-19

Michael J. Kaufman v. Bituminous Casualty Corporation
they are owed $95,114.82. We are not persuaded. ¶16 Because the elements of loss refer to all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6883 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 30, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
an $80,000 debt he owed his parents. She contends that the debt was no longer enforceable because more than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27296 - 2006-11-29

COURT OF APPEALS
stating that $217,326.24 was owed on Curro’s account as of May 31, 2008, with interest accruing at $107.17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42721 - 2009-10-27

[PDF] James H. Cameron v. Jane P. Cameron
arrearages owed by her former husband, James Cameron, are to be paid. Wise also appeals that portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8588 - 2017-09-19

Certification
by [the employer], this asset is [the nonemployee-spouse’s] sole and separate property and any money owed
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80350 - 2012-04-03

COURT OF APPEALS
that loans from Denise’s mother totaled $287,388 and that Denise was entitled to a credit for that sum owed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50547 - 2010-06-13

COURT OF APPEALS
in this case is whether, by virtue of various common-law theories, Specialists owes Londre a portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142715 - 2015-06-01