Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2041 - 2050 of 20367 for sai.
Search results 2041 - 2050 of 20367 for sai.
COURT OF APPEALS
was not free to leave if he or she had not responded, one cannot say the questioning resulted in a detention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31622 - 2008-01-22
was not free to leave if he or she had not responded, one cannot say the questioning resulted in a detention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31622 - 2008-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
. and Rose M. Merker further indicated that she heard Rose M. tell TAO, “You know what to say,” to which TAO
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101290 - 2013-08-27
. and Rose M. Merker further indicated that she heard Rose M. tell TAO, “You know what to say,” to which TAO
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101290 - 2013-08-27
[PDF]
State v. Gary Curtis
to say that a defendant is automatically entitled to an evidentiary hearing no matter how cursory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11531 - 2017-09-19
to say that a defendant is automatically entitled to an evidentiary hearing no matter how cursory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11531 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
saying Alizay was just tired. Scott, her mother, and Alizay drove to the bank. While Scott’s mother
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50330 - 2010-05-25
saying Alizay was just tired. Scott, her mother, and Alizay drove to the bank. While Scott’s mother
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50330 - 2010-05-25
State v. Robert M. James
for breathalyzer test. Q. How did you respond to that? A. I responded by saying okay. Q. Is that indeed, did you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7652 - 2005-03-31
for breathalyzer test. Q. How did you respond to that? A. I responded by saying okay. Q. Is that indeed, did you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7652 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Juneau County Dept. of Human Services v. James B.
) is erroneous. The statute says that counsel appointed in cases arising under WIS. STAT. § 48.375, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15535 - 2017-09-21
) is erroneous. The statute says that counsel appointed in cases arising under WIS. STAT. § 48.375, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15535 - 2017-09-21
State v. Thomas V.C.
notwithstanding. “[H]e was going to plead guilty no matter what, no matter what his attorney did, to say, to talk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2557 - 2005-03-31
notwithstanding. “[H]e was going to plead guilty no matter what, no matter what his attorney did, to say, to talk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2557 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
if he or she had not responded, one cannot say the questioning resulted in a detention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31622 - 2014-09-15
if he or she had not responded, one cannot say the questioning resulted in a detention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31622 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court reviewed the subpoena, stating: The subpoena says that these two officers were served on May 17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28728 - 2007-04-16
. The court reviewed the subpoena, stating: The subpoena says that these two officers were served on May 17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28728 - 2007-04-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. First, she says that she was not charged with disorderly conduct. In fact, Barnes was initially
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141369 - 2017-09-21
. First, she says that she was not charged with disorderly conduct. In fact, Barnes was initially
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141369 - 2017-09-21