Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2041 - 2050 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 2041 - 2050 of 58285 for speedy trial.
State v. William Napper
, after a jury trial, for first-degree intentional homicide while armed, attempted first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8365 - 2005-03-31
, after a jury trial, for first-degree intentional homicide while armed, attempted first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8365 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Terron Napper
, appeal from their judgments of convictions, after a jury trial, for first-degree intentional homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8364 - 2017-09-19
, appeal from their judgments of convictions, after a jury trial, for first-degree intentional homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8364 - 2017-09-19
State v. Terron Napper
, after a jury trial, for first-degree intentional homicide while armed, attempted first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8364 - 2005-03-31
, after a jury trial, for first-degree intentional homicide while armed, attempted first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8364 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
his motion for sentence modification. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31786 - 2014-09-15
his motion for sentence modification. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31786 - 2014-09-15
State v. Leporld L. Miller
to testify, he was not “present at the beginning of the trial” under § 971.04(3), Stats., and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8511 - 2005-03-31
to testify, he was not “present at the beginning of the trial” under § 971.04(3), Stats., and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8511 - 2005-03-31
WI App 156 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2393-CR Complete Titl...
also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion. Saunders argues that at trial the prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74074 - 2011-12-13
also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion. Saunders argues that at trial the prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74074 - 2011-12-13
[PDF]
WI App 156
argues that at trial the prosecutor—contrary to WIS. STAT. § 971.23(8)(a), Wisconsin’s notice of alibi
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74074 - 2014-09-15
argues that at trial the prosecutor—contrary to WIS. STAT. § 971.23(8)(a), Wisconsin’s notice of alibi
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74074 - 2014-09-15
State v. George Reed
. Reed claims that: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion for a new trial based on newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13073 - 2005-03-31
. Reed claims that: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion for a new trial based on newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13073 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
were dismissed and read in for purposes of sentencing. ¶2 The trial court sentenced Schmidt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34641 - 2008-11-18
were dismissed and read in for purposes of sentencing. ¶2 The trial court sentenced Schmidt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34641 - 2008-11-18
[PDF]
State v. George Reed
denying his postconviction motions. Reed claims that: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13073 - 2017-09-21
denying his postconviction motions. Reed claims that: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13073 - 2017-09-21