Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20401 - 20410 of 58285 for speedy trial.

Waukesha County v. Spencer C.N.
by the Waukesha county corporation counsel, the trial court disregarded the supreme court’s directive that circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13752 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jack R. Martinsen
. Martinsen argues that the trial court erroneously construed the statutory requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11605 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Richard T. Wittrock
that the State failed to fully disclose discovery materials to his trial counsel, trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17635 - 2017-09-21

State v. Christopher A. Knapp
of more than 2500 grams of tetrahydrocannabinols with intent to deliver. The issues are whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8162 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
or sixth offense, based on an incident in July 2017.2 The case proceeded to a jury trial, and the jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=310077 - 2020-12-03

State v. Patrick C. Webster
postconviction relief. The issues concern whether the trial court properly sentenced him as a repeater on one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13366 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Michael D.J. Crochiere
motions. He argues that his trial attorneys were ineffective because they waived the preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9587 - 2017-09-19

State v. Patrick C. Webster
postconviction relief. The issues concern whether the trial court properly sentenced him as a repeater on one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13369 - 2005-03-31

State v. William C. Rosenberg
of disposition without trials. Rosenberg entered pleas of no contest to all three OWI charges. The parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15847 - 2005-03-31

State v. Robert C. Braun
to § 785.01(1)(b), Stats., for violating a permanent injunction. He claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12045 - 2005-03-31