Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20411 - 20420 of 50107 for our.
Search results 20411 - 20420 of 50107 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Rein has filed a response challenging his pleas and sentences. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026974 - 2025-10-21
. Rein has filed a response challenging his pleas and sentences. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026974 - 2025-10-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
410. Our review is “highly deferential.” State v. Kimbrough, 2001 WI App 138, ¶12, 246 Wis. 2d 648
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1025541 - 2025-10-21
410. Our review is “highly deferential.” State v. Kimbrough, 2001 WI App 138, ¶12, 246 Wis. 2d 648
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1025541 - 2025-10-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
410. Our review is “highly deferential.” State v. Kimbrough, 2001 WI App 138, ¶12, 246 Wis. 2d 648
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1025541 - 2025-10-21
410. Our review is “highly deferential.” State v. Kimbrough, 2001 WI App 138, ¶12, 246 Wis. 2d 648
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1025541 - 2025-10-21
State v. Thomas L. Gillen
: The potential penalties for a fifth or subsequent offense under our laws are up to five years incarceration. Do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5615 - 2005-03-31
: The potential penalties for a fifth or subsequent offense under our laws are up to five years incarceration. Do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5615 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on § 450.01(10) to define drug under the OWI law. No. 2012AP522-CR 6 charge. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85627 - 2014-09-15
on § 450.01(10) to define drug under the OWI law. No. 2012AP522-CR 6 charge. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85627 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Booker T. Shipp
of the decision as our own. Moreover, because we have concluded that Groves’s absence was not prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12868 - 2017-09-21
of the decision as our own. Moreover, because we have concluded that Groves’s absence was not prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12868 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. As part of our analysis, we interpreted § 973.20(13)(c)2. as allowing restitution to be imposed after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151506 - 2017-09-21
. As part of our analysis, we interpreted § 973.20(13)(c)2. as allowing restitution to be imposed after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151506 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John L. Dye, Jr.
in the jailing of the defendant? Our experience as courts with victims of sexual violence and domestic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5897 - 2017-09-19
in the jailing of the defendant? Our experience as courts with victims of sexual violence and domestic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5897 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Scott R. Weber
. DISCUSSION A. The Disorderly Conduct Conviction Our review of the sufficiency of evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14438 - 2017-09-21
. DISCUSSION A. The Disorderly Conduct Conviction Our review of the sufficiency of evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14438 - 2017-09-21
Jodi Hurlburt v. OHIC Insurance Company
. A complaint was not filed. Id. at 426-27. Our supreme court determined that there was no action pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5101 - 2005-03-31
. A complaint was not filed. Id. at 426-27. Our supreme court determined that there was no action pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5101 - 2005-03-31