Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20411 - 20420 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Search results 20411 - 20420 of 58547 for speedy trial.
County of Dane v. William S.
§ 51.42 Board for outpatient treatment. He claims that the trial court erred in not dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11243 - 2005-03-31
§ 51.42 Board for outpatient treatment. He claims that the trial court erred in not dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11243 - 2005-03-31
State v. Craig J. Anderson
performance. Hearing Attendance Anderson claims that the trial court erred when it refused to order his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12555 - 2005-03-31
performance. Hearing Attendance Anderson claims that the trial court erred when it refused to order his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12555 - 2005-03-31
State v. David J. Arnold
were voluntary. We reverse the suppression order and remand to the trial court. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3862 - 2005-03-31
were voluntary. We reverse the suppression order and remand to the trial court. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3862 - 2005-03-31
County of Jefferson v. Mark L. Guttenberg
are not in dispute, inasmuch as the parties stipulated in the trial court that Guttenberg’s motion to suppress could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12876 - 2005-03-31
are not in dispute, inasmuch as the parties stipulated in the trial court that Guttenberg’s motion to suppress could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12876 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for postconviction relief. The issues on appeal are whether: (1) trial counsel provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54755 - 2010-09-22
motion for postconviction relief. The issues on appeal are whether: (1) trial counsel provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54755 - 2010-09-22
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Carrie M.W.
and that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it terminated her rights. We reject both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5783 - 2005-03-31
and that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it terminated her rights. We reject both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5783 - 2005-03-31
Scott G. Biesterveld v. Mark W. Roob
, the trial court granted a default judgment. The issues are whether the trial court’s decision to grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3122 - 2005-03-31
, the trial court granted a default judgment. The issues are whether the trial court’s decision to grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3122 - 2005-03-31
Paul Steven Screnock v. Malyn Screnock
. Upon reviewing the record, we conclude that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13895 - 2005-03-31
. Upon reviewing the record, we conclude that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13895 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Jefferson v. Mark L. Guttenberg
are not in dispute, inasmuch as the parties stipulated in the trial court that Guttenberg’s motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12876 - 2017-09-21
are not in dispute, inasmuch as the parties stipulated in the trial court that Guttenberg’s motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12876 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jack R. Martinsen
. Martinsen argues that the trial court erroneously construed the statutory requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11605 - 2005-03-31
. Martinsen argues that the trial court erroneously construed the statutory requirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11605 - 2005-03-31