Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20421 - 20430 of 37917 for d's.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to two years consistent with WIS. STAT. § 973.01(2)(d)6. (stating that the term of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724503 - 2023-11-07

[PDF] State v. Lee Anton Jackson
“ma[d]e [its] intent perfectly clear ... it was translated out of context in the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10749 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
of, and the alternatives to, accepting medication or treatment.” Virgil D. v. Rock County, 189 Wis. 2d 1, 11, 524 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32347 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
(classifying the offense as a Class F felony), 973.01(2)(b)6m and (d)4 (providing maximum terms of seven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064976 - 2026-01-21

State v. Carmen L. Harrell
. We focus on the standard relevant to our remand: whether the new factor “frustrate[d] the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25835 - 2006-08-29

Marian R. Crosswhite v. Deborah L. Zivko
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: WILLIAM D. GARDNER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9495 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 24, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
of jurisdiction. Under Wis. Stat. § 806.07(1)(d), a party may bring a motion requesting relief from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26883 - 2006-10-23

COURT OF APPEALS
and dated July 11, 2003.” In the mortgage, the Nasmans also “mortgage[d], grant[ed] and convey[ed] to MERS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92377 - 2013-02-04

[PDF] CA Blank Order
D., 2002 WI App 318, ¶30, 259 Wis. 2d 429, 655 N.W.2d 752. “When reviewing a jury’s verdict, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1049269 - 2025-12-11

[PDF] CA Blank Order
D., 2002 WI App 318, ¶30, 259 Wis. 2d 429, 655 N.W.2d 752. “When reviewing a jury’s verdict, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1049269 - 2025-12-11