Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 20421 - 20430 of 29845 for des.
Search results 20421 - 20430 of 29845 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo.” See Waukesha County v. J.W.J., 2017 WI 57, ¶15, 375 Wis. 2d 542, 895 N.W.2d 783
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=702473 - 2023-09-12
de novo.” See Waukesha County v. J.W.J., 2017 WI 57, ¶15, 375 Wis. 2d 542, 895 N.W.2d 783
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=702473 - 2023-09-12
[PDF]
Robert Rhiel v. Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corp.
facts which creates a de novo standard of review. See State v. Keith, 175 Wis.2d 75, 78, 498 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11757 - 2017-09-20
facts which creates a de novo standard of review. See State v. Keith, 175 Wis.2d 75, 78, 498 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11757 - 2017-09-20
2008 WI APP 171
facts. This presents a question of law for our de novo review. See State v. Wilke, 152 Wis. 2d 243
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34188 - 2008-11-11
facts. This presents a question of law for our de novo review. See State v. Wilke, 152 Wis. 2d 243
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34188 - 2008-11-11
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. §971.08 or other mandatory duties at a plea hearing is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136507 - 2015-03-04
. Stat. §971.08 or other mandatory duties at a plea hearing is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136507 - 2015-03-04
COURT OF APPEALS
). Application of a statute to the facts of record presents a question of law subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29625 - 2007-07-10
). Application of a statute to the facts of record presents a question of law subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29625 - 2007-07-10
State v. Joseph Williams
. Whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are issues of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11239 - 2005-03-31
. Whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are issues of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11239 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Duane E. Elm
and whether it prejudiced the defendant's defense are questions of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7830 - 2017-09-19
and whether it prejudiced the defendant's defense are questions of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7830 - 2017-09-19
Vladimir M. Gorokhovsky v. Jan Edwards
, which we review de novo. Williams v. Security Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 120 Wis. 2d 480, 482, 355 N.W.2d 370
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5091 - 2005-03-31
, which we review de novo. Williams v. Security Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 120 Wis. 2d 480, 482, 355 N.W.2d 370
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5091 - 2005-03-31
State v. David S. Frederick
review the trial court's factual findings under a clearly erroneous standard, and we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13795 - 2005-03-31
review the trial court's factual findings under a clearly erroneous standard, and we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13795 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James L. Blackburn
the interpretation of § 976.05, STATS., a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Whittemore, 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12090 - 2017-09-21
the interpretation of § 976.05, STATS., a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Whittemore, 166
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12090 - 2017-09-21